From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:37:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20080614233712.GA15269@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20080614071011.GA29699@glandium.org> <7vprqkh423.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vlk17horn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sven X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 15 01:38:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K7fK1-0002sa-3M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:38:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755632AbYFNXhR (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:37:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755635AbYFNXhR (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:37:17 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:3168 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755627AbYFNXhQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:37:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 17348 invoked by uid 111); 14 Jun 2008 23:37:13 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:37:13 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:37:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: [the usual convention on this list is to cc all participants] On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 06:26:00PM +0000, Sven wrote: > > (1) I do not think it is unreasonable to change update-server-info > > to include HEAD in its output. That would make ls-remote > > output over all protocols consistent; > > As Jeff said, he has already done this and it will roll with the > upcoming release. To clarify: - I didn't do it, Daniel did. I just used git-log to find it (the commit is be885d96). - That change has nothing to do with update-server-info, but rather happens entirely on the client side. And it appears to just manually add HEAD to the fetch list. -Peff