From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] git-add--interactive: manual hunk editing mode v2 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:46:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20080605094613.GA17089@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <200805232221.45406.trast@student.ethz.ch> <200806051105.02802.trast@student.ethz.ch> <20080605092016.GA16748@sigill.intra.peff.net> <200806051138.28889.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 05 11:48:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K4C3q-0006OA-6X for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:47:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753689AbYFEJqR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:46:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754031AbYFEJqR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:46:17 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:2538 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753689AbYFEJqQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 05:46:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 22065 invoked by uid 111); 5 Jun 2008 09:46:15 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:46:15 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:46:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200806051138.28889.trast@student.ethz.ch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote: > Maybe git gui could do a sort of "toggle the lines I click" interface. > But I don't know anything about Tk, or Tcl, or git gui :-( That would probably be a reasonable interface. But I don't use git-gui, so I personally am not interested in that. ;) > Now I'm slightly confused. > > Doing it that way would be almost like my original patch > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg66971.html > > minus the numeric prefixes -- meaning that you have to say y/n to > _every_ line in the patch, at least until all remaining hunks are the > same and you can answer the rest with a/d. Hmm, I suppose it is. Sorry, I'm just trying to brainstorm a bit about other options, but I think that my proposal really isn't that good an idea. -Peff