From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Foster Subject: Re: fsck --full is Ok, but clones are not, "missing commits"?! Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:44:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20080417184404.2541227DD@blf.utvinternet.co.uk> References: <200804171756.39911.brian.foster@innova-card.com> Reply-To: git@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Dmitry Potapov , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Brandon Casey X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 17 21:21:29 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmZ7C-0003WU-Sk for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:45:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751489AbYDQSpB convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:45:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751432AbYDQSpA (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:45:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pc.visp.tiscali.fr ([213.36.240.240]:41841 "EHLO mail.visp.tiscali.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751424AbYDQSpA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:45:00 -0400 Received: from blf.utvinternet.co.uk (213.36.236.163) by mail.visp.tiscali.fr (7.3.117.3) id 47A04684007CD2E9; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:44:15 +0200 Received: from blf.utvinternet.ie (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blf.utvinternet.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2541227DD; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:44:04 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <200804171756.39911.brian.foster@innova-card.com> Comments: In-reply-to Brian Foster message dated "Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:56:39 +0200". X-Mailer: [nmh-1.1-RC1] MH.6.8, SUSE Linux 9.1 X-URL: http://www.blf.utvinternet.ie Content-ID: <21308.1208457844.1@blf.utvinternet.ie> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Brandon Casey justifiably complains: > p.s. It's more polite to keep the people you are responding > to in the cc list. Take a look at how Hannes did it > (the email to which this one is replying). Usually > it's enough to select 'Reply All'. Brandon et al., oops! sorry, my bad. apologies. I'm well aware of this point. if you look at my _other_ replies, you should see that they are Ok. the problem is the MTA at work insists on adding HTML "if you read this you are a criminal" b*s* attachments (at least 3 bads!). the posts are (rightly) binned by majordomo. so I've been posting from my gmail account (mostly), which is not intended for my work. that's my private life, @&*%$(^! so the posts go to my work account, and hence I must manually transfer data such as the CC's: list/cc ---> work --(fwd/reply, no cc)--> \ gmail --(compose reply, add cc)--> list+cc this is also why the threading is (probably) broken, and may be the reason for the "Re: Re: ..." nonsense (albeit I'm not sure just how that happens?), and/or sometimes replying to the "wrong" e-address. ;-( I simply forgot. sorry! (this reply's from home, so I don't have at-hand the data you asked for. tomorrow.) and yes, I know this reply is OT & long. cheers! -blf- --=20 =E2=80=9CHow many surrealists does it take to | Brian Foster change a lightbulb? Three. One calms | somewhere in south of Franc= e the warthog, and two fill the bathtub | Stop E$$o (ExxonMobil)! with brightly-coloured machine tools.=E2=80=9D | http://www.sto= pesso.com