Hallo,

Junio C Hamano schrieb am Sat 12. Apr, 23:20 (-0700):
> Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> writes:
> 
> > “This makes it easier to test for equality of a commit in the TODO list
> > and one of SHORTUPSTREAM, SHORTHEAD or SHORTONTO.”
> 
> "Equality testing?" --- that makes me worried.  short=7 does not chomp
> them at 7 but only tells rev-parse to use at least 7.  You may get 8 or
> more if there are other objects that share the same prefix when you get
> them.
> 
> Perhaps by forcing "at least 7" everywhere you are getting consistent
> result that makes them easier to compare.

That's what I want.

> But considering that this is a candidate for a general mechanism to
> eventual grow into the git-sequencer, and that we expect to have richer,
> smarter, and/or more complex set of tools that feeds you the TODO list,
> I'd feel safer if the internal comparison used to determine which one
> commit the user meant in his TODO file is robust and does not rely on
> where the abbreviated object name was chomped at.

I use it one time while building the TODO list given to the editor. I've
to replace $UPSTREAM with $ONTO everywhere $UPSTREAM occures.

Do you still have a bad feeling? I can replace all tests by

  test "$(git rev-parse $a)" = "$(git rev-parse $b)"

Bye, Jörg.
-- 
Was man mühelos erreichen kann, ist gewöhnlich nicht der Mühe wert,
erreicht zu werden.