From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: GSoC 2008 - Mentors Wanted! Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:13:20 +0100 Message-ID: <200803052213.20501.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> References: <20080304051149.GS8410@spearce.org> <20080305053612.GA8410@spearce.org> <7bfdc29a0803042358n6126286dr7a17f3b4dadbabe5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , "Carlos Rica" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" To: "Imran M Yousuf" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 05 22:15:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JX0x6-0005vZ-Hb for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:15:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755035AbYCEVO0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:14:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755261AbYCEVO0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:14:26 -0500 Received: from [83.140.172.130] ([83.140.172.130]:3547 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755022AbYCEVOZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:14:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01778027F2; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:14:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino.dewire.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iyitU72COSHw; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:14:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.9.0.7] (unknown [10.9.0.7]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4718006B6; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:14:20 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <7bfdc29a0803042358n6126286dr7a17f3b4dadbabe5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Den Wednesday 05 March 2008 08.58.15 skrev Imran M Yousuf: > I would like to suggest 2 projects that I want to work as a developer > (and/or mentor): > > 1. GIT SCM Plugin for NetBeans (GPLv2 with CPE, same as NetBeans) > The aim of the plugin is to integrate GIT with NetBeans using JNI so > that any change in the implementation of GIT does not effect the SCM > plugins way of work. > Language: Java > Goal: Make GIT available from IDE for NetBeans users and use GIT using > Java Native Interfaces As the current acting maintainer or egit/jgit I would not mind cooperating with making it available to Netbeans, J2EE and command line interface or whatever. You can make a plugin for Netbeans today that will do the basic like walking the history, finding out what to commit, commit, switch/create/reset branches, decorations based on jgit and you wouldn't need to change a thing in jgit. There might be things you *want* to change, but that's another story and applied to the continued development for the Eclipse plugin too. Even the license might be changed. You will find support in jgit for this today. Cloning over git and ssh real soon. I'm clensing the oopses from the history right now. (bless rebase -i and git-gui). There are no dependencies on Eclipse and I do not plan on introducing any. Jgit and Egit live in the same repo at the moment simply because there are no other users of egit so far. There might be some operations that might be harder to do well in Java. For those exec'ing might be the solution, I'm thinking repack, but then I haven't tried it yet. In general jgit is almost as fast as git and probably outperforms git on windows as git there doesn't use memory mapped I/O for packs (something I'd expect someone or even me to fix soon). For JNI'ed operations the complexity is just horrible and even when possible, there is a lot of overhead for JNI itselt, conversion from UTF-16 to somehing eightbitish and back. On windows there's even yet another layer of eight-bitish to UTF-16 and back in the Win32 API. Jgit also uses memory mapped I/O on all platforms that support it for pack reading. If someone *did* make a fully reentrant libgit, I'd be inclined to balance my opinions differently. -- robin