From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Which freedesktop.org "design flaws" in git are still relevant? Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:16:29 +0100 Message-ID: <200802292216.29788.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0802291232w166b3100yabd30ba30df6ef1f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 29 22:17:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVCbO-0005Mw-SY for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:17:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753159AbYB2VQe (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:16:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753320AbYB2VQd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:16:33 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.186]:45367 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751542AbYB2VQd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:16:33 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z23so5706142fkz.5 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:16:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=O1bp6sNxZq0LH3g5U7n8dKH824RfGXdgfyLOVj94pjg=; b=SBqUZovLX6kDPXimJK71K3N/g15j7ibgQjtidyKYXag13FyA7WDPE+zWdfOrG4Df3dKua9lXuxXBGcw5xJDbXzJkcUtkszJ8+tCxUc4i+WR9z6NvThwGfm4WkEnbBaf31ryUiZglJvH08biKoizZyd70TudYaj/UANENVcG4xww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=UGQD6Plp+TCaQGTH3J3wtXN636F2zuOEaWjTDv0+kIQd9Y/nZpcHTD3nFvojKKxfI4Nf9/iuYzD+3YLvQBwfglLs7wSsNt9ZF3VpDss+q3rDYobJpyWpnp2fT1pUnJFSJpUkihrQ3YktyOZLvXCLJtfDjbP9nPvXrUz72Th0hgQ= Received: by 10.82.121.15 with SMTP id t15mr17046630buc.32.1204319791474; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:16:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.15? ( [83.8.217.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k9sm204373nfh.29.2008.02.29.13.16.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:16:30 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Elijah Newren wrote: > >> The page http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/UIFlaws >> contains a number of claimed UI flaws of git. I suspect that a number >> of them are out-of-date; it doesn't seem to jive with my recent >> reading of the documentation. Could anyone point out which are still >> accurate with recent git, and which aren't? > > It says: > > Infrastructure/git/UIFlaws (last edited 2007-06-03 18:41:26 by > JakubNarebski) > > and despite being updated almost 9 months ago, the content feels even > older than that. > > Jakub? http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/UIFlaws?action=info I have just fixed one error there, and didn't take time to correct all the things. P.S. I have replied in another message in this thread, discussion those mentioned "flaws" one by one. -- Jakub Narebski Poland