From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:38:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20071124113814.GA17861@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vmytycykt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vr6j6ve90.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vir4d40sw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwsso3poo.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vfxz89x9q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vabpctx3b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vsl30eyuk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vve7tuz3a.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071123103003.GB6754@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 24 12:38:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IvtLI-0006CP-Mu for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:38:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752472AbXKXLiT (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:38:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752467AbXKXLiT (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:38:19 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:2909 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752465AbXKXLiS (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:38:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 7930 invoked by uid 111); 24 Nov 2007 11:38:16 -0000 Received: from c-24-125-35-113.hsd1.va.comcast.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (24.125.35.113) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:38:16 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:38:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:23:44PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Maybe we could change the (non-fast forward) message into (non-fast > forward; need to pull?). Not unreasonable, although I think our line length is getting a bit long. Rejected refs would look something like (actually they say "[rejected]" but the text is column-aligned with the X's): ! XXXXXXX...XXXXXXX ref_name -> ref_name (non-fast forward; need to pull?) There's 58 characters of text not including the two ref_names, leaving about 11 characters for each ref name. The name of this topic, jk/send-pack, would overflow an 80-character terminal: ! [rejected] jk/send-pack -> jk/send-pack (non-fast forward; need to pull?) -Peff