From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: remote#branch Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20071031015938.GB24403@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071029214925.GH21133@thunk.org> <20071030030104.GK21133@thunk.org> <7vtzo9s221.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071030044026.GA9600@thunk.org> <46a038f90710301741n67526976vda1cd131270aa7f@mail.gmail.com> <20071031014347.GB23274@coredump.intra.peff.net> <46a038f90710301849h1c31736an1ec163aa1e274577@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Langhoff X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 31 02:59:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1In2s7-0003e2-W0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 02:59:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752498AbXJaB7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751776AbXJaB7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:41 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:2206 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751344AbXJaB7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 6656 invoked by uid 111); 31 Oct 2007 01:59:39 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:39 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46a038f90710301849h1c31736an1ec163aa1e274577@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:49:49PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > Actually, IIRC it won't fetch any of the non 'blue' refs. > You recall correctly, and that was a cogito misfeature. I don't think > git should follow that part of the spec ;-) I'm not so sure. Junio keeps unrelated branches in git.git like 'html' and 'todo'. Is it unreasonable to say "clone git.git, but only the todo branch" and expect it _not_ to download the entire git history? -Peff