From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git/spearce.git (topics) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:48:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20071023034830.GA28280@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20071022063222.GS14735@spearce.org> <20071022071644.GA7290@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 23 05:48:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IkAl4-0000EF-2G for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 05:48:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751848AbXJWDsf (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:48:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751917AbXJWDse (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:48:34 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3808 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891AbXJWDse (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:48:34 -0400 Received: (qmail 31225 invoked by uid 111); 23 Oct 2007 03:48:32 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:48:32 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:48:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:32:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Your patch is better than what used to be there, but > > > - /* Already picked as a destination? */ > > + /* Already picked as a source? */ > > if (!p->src_dst) > > continue; > > the above is wrong, the whole thing should be dropped (we *want* to be > able to re-use sources). Oops, you're right. I'm not sure what I was thinking. > Anyway, the set of fixes I sent out earlier included fixing that stupid > loop as one of the things. Looks like you have made some real progress. I'll try to review your patch tonight, and hopefully make some progress on the inexact case. -Peff