On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:32:22AM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > * ph/parseopt (Mon Oct 15 23:06:02 2007 +0200) 22 commits > - Make builtin-pack-refs.c use parse_options. > - Make builtin-name-rev.c use parse_options. > - Make builtin-count-objects.c use parse_options. > - Make builtin-fsck.c use parse_options. > - Update manpages to reflect new short and long option aliases > - Make builtin-for-each-ref.c use parse-opts. > - Make builtin-symbolic-ref.c use parse_options. > - Make builtin-update-ref.c use parse_options > - Make builtin-revert.c use parse_options. > - Make builtin-describe.c use parse_options > - Make builtin-branch.c use parse_options. > - Make builtin-mv.c use parse-options > - Make builtin-rm.c use parse_options. > - Port builtin-add.c to use the new option parser. > - parse-options: allow callbacks to take no arguments at all. > - parse-options: Allow abbreviated options when unambiguous > - Add shortcuts for very often used options. > - parse-options: make some arguments optional, add callbacks. > - Rework make_usage to print the usage message immediately > - Add tests for parse-options.c > - parse-options: be able to generate usages automatically > - Add a simple option parser. > > There's actually a few other commits (3?) missing from the above > list that are safely parked away in my tree. I'm most of the way > through reviewing these and have made a few bug fixes and style > nit corrections in the earlier parts of the series. I'm going to > try and finish working through this series tomorrow and then will > probably merge it to next. > The other 3 commits are hanging off to the side as 2 of them are > for the top of db/fetch-pack (to port builtin-fetch and friends > to the new option parser) and the 3rd is a somewhat questionable > change due to needing to rename a "-h" to a "-H". I just got > tired of rebasing these 3 other commits onto the respective topics. > I'm waiting for the core option parser (above) to freeze on a commit > SHA-1 before I deal with these again. You also can ask me to resubmit them when the first round of parseopt is merged. I'm actually waiting for that before I work on it again (that's not the sole reason, $work ate my time as well, so I'm not pressuring ;P) and I can send those again when things are more ready for them. Like I said to you on IRC, I intend to hack a way to ask parse-options to dump its options in a machine parseable way, to help {z,ba}sh completions authors. And obviously I intend to migrate even more builtins :) -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org