From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Wielemaker Subject: Re: Qgit performance and maintain CVS environment with GIT repository Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:43:44 +0200 Organization: HCS, University of Amsterdam Message-ID: <200710190943.45201.wielemak@science.uva.nl> References: <598689.78740.qm@web56015.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <4717F8CF.9060103@bluelane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Marco Costalba , Robin Rosenberg , piet.delaney@gmail.piet.net, Linus Torvalds , VMiklos , free cycle , git@vger.kernel.org, piet.delaney@gmail.com, Piet Delaney To: pete@bluelane.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 19 09:54:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iimgg-0003L2-PN for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:54:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764599AbXJSHyQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:54:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763316AbXJSHyP (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:54:15 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.30]:3960 "EHLO smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764599AbXJSHyN (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:54:13 -0400 Received: from gollem.science.uva.nl (gollem.science.uva.nl [146.50.26.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9J7nsZZ093487; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:49:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wielemak@science.uva.nl) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 In-Reply-To: <4717F8CF.9060103@bluelane.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Friday 19 October 2007 02:22, Pete/Piet Delaney wrote: > We are definitely not fine with CVS, the branch merging isn't > comfortable. I'm just wondering about maintaining the existing > CVS browsers and the build scripts if it's not a big deal. I'll > try the git-cvsserver path. If anyone has any war stories to share > on the path this would be an ideal time to share them. As for web browsing the history, our project was quickly convinced gitweb is a lot better than cvsweb. We are starting to get use to basic git. One developer works on CVS. This is a bit handicapped, but workable after a few patches to git-shell and git-cvsserver. In another project I use git-cvsserver to do the Windows builds. All development except for minor typos and compatibility things is done on linux and cvs <-> git works just fine for that model. --- Jan