From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luke Lu <git@vicaya.com>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@weinigel.se>,
Tom Tobin <korpios@korpios.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: On Tabs and Spaces
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:45:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071018024553.GA5186@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710171753020.26902@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:59:27PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> It happens. We do de-spacification in the kernel occasionally when it is
> an annoyance. Usually it shows up in patches, though - exactly because
> code which adds spaces instead of tabs won't line up correctly in the
> diff.
You have made this claim several times, and I really don't understand
it. If I have 8 spaces, then a diff line will have either " ", "+", or
"-" followed by 8 spaces. If I use a hard tab, then the tab will end up
only taking up 7 spaces because of the nature of tabs.
This might matter if I'm comparing non-diff code to diff code. But in a
diff, _everything_ is indented by exactly one space, so it all lines up.
Is there something I'm missing?
> So it doesn't matter *which* one you use (all spaces or all tabs) in that
> sense.
Yes, I agree with that (even with an all-tabs policy, there are still
mangled and incorrect patches that come in -- and the maintainer rejects
or fixes them).
Which was what I was trying to point out with my question (though I was
also curious to hear your answer): all-space versus all-tab is largely a
matter of preference. And that means that people who want git to change
to _their_ preference are just being silly.
> And smaller *is* faster. Do something like this on the kernel:
>
> GIT_PAGER= time git grep sched_fair
>
> and then do the same thing with the kernel sources blown up by 20% by
> de-tabification. Guess which one is 20% slower?
I was about to tell you that you're full of it, but there really is a
slowdown:
$ cd linux-2.6
$ GIT_PAGER= time git grep sched_fair >/dev/null
0.34user 0.94system 0:01.30elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+7548minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ find . -name .git -prune -o -type f | xargs perl -pi -e 's/\t/ /g'
$ git-commit -a -m de-tabify
$ git-repack -a -d
$ GIT_PAGER= time git grep sched_fair >/dev/null
0.42user 1.06system 0:01.54elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+7591minor)pagefaults 0swaps
It's actually about 16%.
Gah, I can't believe I've not only been sucked into a tab vs spaces
discussion, but now I've actually wasted time doing a performance
comparison on it.
As an aside, that commit was enough to trigger a "git-gc --auto", which
was my first experience with it. It's actually kind of annoying
(especially since I was about to repack -a -d).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-16 6:45 On Tabs and Spaces Michael Witten
2007-10-16 7:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-16 7:27 ` Michael Witten
2007-10-16 17:20 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-16 17:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-16 23:09 ` Petr Baudis
2007-10-17 3:41 ` David
2007-10-17 11:32 ` Andy Parkins
2007-10-16 8:30 ` Adam Piatyszek
2007-10-16 9:04 ` Lars Hjemli
2007-10-16 10:16 ` Adam Piatyszek
2007-10-16 15:26 ` Jeffrey C. Ollie
2007-10-16 15:51 ` Michael Witten
2007-10-16 17:06 ` Jari Aalto
2007-10-16 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-16 19:36 ` Mike Hommey
2007-10-16 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-16 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-16 20:32 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-10-16 20:18 ` Tom Tobin
2007-10-16 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-16 23:51 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-10-17 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 3:08 ` Michael Witten
2007-10-17 3:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 7:17 ` Luke Lu
2007-10-17 9:09 ` Michael Witten
2007-10-17 10:03 ` Luke Lu
2007-10-17 10:21 ` Nikolai Weibull
2007-10-17 11:23 ` Michael Witten
2007-10-17 22:02 ` Jari Aalto
2007-10-17 22:36 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-17 23:38 ` Jari Aalto
2007-10-18 4:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-18 8:19 ` Jari Aalto
2007-10-18 11:34 ` Petr Baudis
2007-10-18 11:39 ` Nikolai Weibull
2007-10-22 3:39 ` Miles Bader
2007-10-18 7:15 ` David Kågedal
2007-10-18 5:42 ` Mike Hommey
2007-10-18 10:36 ` Jari Aalto
2007-10-17 15:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-17 18:25 ` Tom Tobin
2007-10-17 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 19:33 ` Tom Tobin
2007-10-17 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 19:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-17 19:52 ` Josh England
2007-10-17 19:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 21:21 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-10-17 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 6:25 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-17 22:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-17 23:17 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-10-17 23:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-18 0:31 ` Christer Weinigel
2007-10-18 6:02 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-18 7:12 ` David Kågedal
2007-10-17 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 20:31 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-17 21:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-17 19:47 ` Jan Wielemaker
2007-10-18 0:32 ` Jeff King
2007-10-18 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 2:45 ` Jeff King [this message]
2007-10-18 3:03 ` david
2007-10-18 3:00 ` Jeff King
2007-10-18 3:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 4:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 3:23 ` Jeff King
2007-10-18 4:41 ` [PATCH] Add a message explaining that automatic GC is about to start koreth
2007-10-18 4:44 ` Steven Grimm
2007-10-18 5:01 ` Jeff King
2007-10-18 5:11 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-18 13:52 ` Brian Gernhardt
2007-10-18 14:16 ` Steven Grimm
2007-10-18 18:08 ` Jeff King
2007-10-19 0:16 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 1:12 ` [PATCH] git-gc: improve wording of --auto notification Jeff King
2007-10-19 1:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-19 1:26 ` Jeff King
2007-10-18 14:21 ` [PATCH] Add a message explaining that automatic GC is about to start Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-18 4:52 ` On Tabs and Spaces Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-18 4:54 ` Jeff King
2007-10-18 4:55 ` Jeff King
2007-10-17 16:08 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-17 17:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-10-17 19:52 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-17 17:51 ` Sean
2007-10-17 5:56 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-16 20:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-18 3:31 ` Paul Wankadia
2007-10-18 4:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 4:36 ` Dmitry Potapov
2007-10-16 17:23 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-16 18:34 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-10-16 18:51 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-20 13:54 ` Robin Rosenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071018024553.GA5186@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=christer@weinigel.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=git@vicaya.com \
--cc=korpios@korpios.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).