On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:39:23PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >   I'm not a huge fan of "xmemdup" as I would not have supposed that a
> > function called like that would add the extra NUL, so I'm 100% okay with
> > someone coming up with any better name.
>
> xmemdupz()?

  Why not, it's definitely better than xmemdupasstring ;)

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org