git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>, Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] git-merge-pack
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 00:07:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070907040731.GT18160@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0709061942320.21186@xanadu.home>

Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
> I would have concatenated all packs provided on the command line into a 
> single one, simply by reading data from existing packs and writing it 
> back without any processing at all.  The offset for OBJ_OFS_DELTA is 
> relative so a simple concatenation will just work.
> 
> Then the index for that pack can be created just as easily by reading 
> existing pack index files and storing the data into an array of struct 
> pack_idx_entry, adding the appropriate offset to object offsets, then 
> call write_idx_file().
> 
> All data is read once and written once making it no more costly than a 
> simple file copy.  On the flip side it wouldn't get rid of duplicated 
> objects (I don't know if that matters i.e. if something might break with 
> the same object twice in a pack).

Yea, that's a really quick repack.  :-)  Plus its actually something
that can be easily halted in the middle and resumed later.  Just need
to save the list of packfiles you are concatenating so you can pick
up later when you get more time.

There shouldn't be a problem with having duplicates in the packfile.
You can do one of two things:

  a) Omit the duplicates from the .idx when you merge the .idx tables
     together to produce the new one.  Just take the object with the
	 earliest offset.

  b) Leave the duplicates in the final .idx.  In this case the
     binary search may pick any of them, but it wouldn't matter
     which it finds.

About the only process that might care about duplicates would be
index-pack.  I don't think it makes sense to run index-pack on a
packfile you already have a .idx for.  I don't think it would have
a problem with the duplicate SHA-1s either, but it wouldn't be hard
to make it do something reasonable when it finds them.
 
> > To consolidate all packs that are smaller than a megabytes into
> > one, you would use it in its current form like this:
> > 
> >     $ old=$(find .git/objects/pack -type f -name '*.pack' -size 1M)
> >     $ new=$(echo "$old" | git merge-pack | git pack-objects pack)
> >     $ for p in $old; do rm -f $p ${p%.pack}.idx; done
> >     $ for s in pack idx; do mv pack-$new.$s .git/objects/pack/; done
> 
> You might want to move the new pack before removing the old ones though.

Not might, *must*.  If you delete the old ones before the new
ones are ready then readers can run into problems trying to access
the objects.  We've spent some effort trying to make these sorts
of operations safe.  No sense in destroying that by getting the
order wrong here.  :)

-- 
Shawn.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-07  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-05  7:09 People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? Linus Torvalds
2007-09-05  7:21 ` Martin Langhoff
2007-09-05  7:37   ` Karl Hasselström
2007-09-05  7:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-05  7:26   ` Tomash Brechko
2007-09-05  8:13   ` Johan Herland
2007-09-05  8:39     ` Matthieu Moy
2007-09-05  8:41       ` Johan Herland
2007-09-05  8:47         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05  8:51       ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-09-05  9:02         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05  9:04         ` Matthieu Moy
2007-09-05  8:51   ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-09-05  7:42 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-09-05  8:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-05  8:50   ` Steven Grimm
     [not found]     ` <86ps0xcwxo.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
2007-09-05  9:07       ` Steven Grimm
2007-09-05  9:13         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05  9:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-05  9:27       ` Martin Langhoff
2007-09-05  9:33         ` Matthieu Moy
2007-09-05 14:17           ` Johan De Messemaeker
2007-09-05 17:31             ` Matthieu Moy
2007-09-05 23:56               ` Jeff King
2007-09-05  9:13     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05  9:14     ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-09-05 17:51   ` Nix
2007-09-05 18:14     ` Steven Grimm
2007-09-05 18:22       ` Nix
2007-09-05 18:54         ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-05 20:01           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-05 20:35             ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-05 21:14               ` Nix
2007-09-05 21:46               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-05 23:04                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-05 23:42                   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-06  0:27                     ` Carlos Rica
2007-09-06  5:55                 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05 21:49               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-05 21:59                 ` Invoke "git gc --auto" from commit, merge, am and rebase Junio C Hamano
2007-09-06  2:39                   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-09-05 20:37             ` [PATCH] Invoke "git gc --auto" from "git add" and "git fetch" Junio C Hamano
     [not found]               ` <69b0c0350709051357ifa547aarfe3e0b36cf9be98f@mail.gmail.com>
2007-09-05 20:59                 ` Fwd: " Govind Salinas
2007-09-06 12:02               ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-05 21:18             ` People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? Alex Riesen
2007-09-06  2:44             ` Russ Dill
2007-09-06  2:52               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-09-06  9:28               ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-09-06  2:45             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-09-06  2:49               ` Steven Grimm
2007-09-06  2:56                 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-09-06 15:54             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 17:49               ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-06 18:15                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-06 18:29                   ` Steven Grimm
2007-09-06 23:12                   ` Subject: [PATCH] git-merge-pack Junio C Hamano
2007-09-06 23:35                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-07  0:51                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-07  1:58                       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07  2:32                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-09-07  4:07                       ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2007-09-07  4:43                       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-08  9:50                         ` [PATCH] make sha1_file.c::matches_pack_name() available to others Junio C Hamano
2007-09-08 10:01                         ` [PATCH] pack-objects --repack-unpacked Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07  7:11                     ` Subject: [PATCH] git-merge-pack Johannes Sixt
2007-09-07  7:34                       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07  7:24                     ` Andy Parkins
2007-09-07  4:48                 ` People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? Shawn O. Pearce
2007-09-07 10:12                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-10-07 18:28           ` What's so special about objects/17/ ? Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-07 18:35             ` Johannes Sixt
2018-10-07 19:06               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-07 22:39                 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-10-08  0:54                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-07 19:46             ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-07 20:07               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-08 19:17                 ` Stefan Beller
2018-10-09  1:03                   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-09 17:37                     ` Stefan Beller
2018-10-10  1:10                       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-10 19:08                         ` Stefan Beller
2018-10-08 10:36               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-09  1:07                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-09 17:40                   ` Stefan Beller
2007-09-05  8:16 ` People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? David Kastrup
2007-09-05 16:47 ` Govind Salinas
2007-09-05 17:19   ` Carl Worth
2007-09-05 17:55     ` Jing Xue
2007-09-05 17:35   ` Steven Grimm
2007-09-05 18:28     ` Nix
2007-09-05 17:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-05 18:46   ` Brandon Casey
2007-09-05 19:09     ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05 19:13       ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-09-05 19:43         ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05 19:20       ` Mike Hommey
2007-09-05 21:07 ` Alex Riesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070907040731.GT18160@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=koreth@midwinter.com \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).