From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 partial summary Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:15:07 +0200 Message-ID: <200708271315.07919.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <200708190128.43515.jnareb@gmail.com> <200708270251.05762.jnareb@gmail.com> <20070827014034.GD18160@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 13:15:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPcZ1-0003G2-1R for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:15:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754531AbXH0LPQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:15:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754497AbXH0LPQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:15:16 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:43257 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753913AbXH0LPO (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:15:14 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1112292nfb for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:15:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=kMwd+MbRZLXA3WxVm4SeoUuCIqlErjAf8521vOA5tVASN+IpVGzVJETK1cJET5u0UdB8ylu2zfkRw9wDi5l0orIob/BkieHNkWTOQ2mrRRc3blgj39LAuEPG86nBb2conVSkRTLbXssgBwPPoiAaByDIYCMuM6nalq96JUEA3To= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ar+pO/CVZ/4h2FB7PFYSGljR36xtfqyuESSozJZCBsvUkawp46eHrFuhmTm2Feb6ijkrGEehdWk/NTv/gH4AZcyLclMtn9+b++5/VWN3nTJrPNnA+jWKJFvX9bfacI4yGvWNf2bJ/h7+yfZr3HqgEBEufbxCtGdxm9f4g4g2Clk= Received: by 10.86.82.16 with SMTP id f16mr4830455fgb.1188213313171; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-89-229-8-65.torun.mm.pl ( [89.229.8.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm3940910fkt.2007.08.27.04.15.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:15:11 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <20070827014034.GD18160@spearce.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Jakub Narebski wrote: >> 04. Which programming languages are you proficient with? >> >> It look like there is only 3/4 people proficient in Perl as compared to >> Python; it looks like Python is more popular. I meant here that Perl to Python is around 3 to 4; more people are proficient in Python than in Perl. >> C is most popular, with >> only a few (if everything is all right with the results page) people >> proficient in Tcl/Tk. I'm sorry, git-gui and gitk guys; it looks like >> not many developers... > > Rather sad given their user base. gitk seems to have at least 30% > of the respondants while git-gui is somewhere between 10-14%, > depending upon the question asked. Odd. qgit has a smaller > respondant base (~7.7%) but is probably the tool that more Git > users would be comfortable hacking on since it is developed in C++. It is not *that* bad, as there are 14 people proficient in Tcl/Tk, while there are 5 people who had made 5 or more commits to either gitk or git-gui. But it is not encouraging. I wonder if PyGTK is as portable as Tcl/Tk... -- Jakub Narebski Poland