From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: What's in git.git (stable) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:54:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20070331115458.GC4377@steel.home> References: <7v1wj5ycx5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 31 13:55:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXcAt-00064k-Aa for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:55:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752971AbXCaLzB (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:55:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752996AbXCaLzB (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:55:01 -0400 Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.188]:45421 "EHLO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752993AbXCaLzA (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:55:00 -0400 Received: from tigra.home (Fc8c6.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.200.198]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo58) (RZmta 5.5) with ESMTP id J01921j2V8QXUi ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:54:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7198277B6; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:54:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by steel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4AC85D150; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:54:57 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v1wj5ycx5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-RZG-AUTH: z4gQVF2k5XWuW3CcuQaEWo+WNdA= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, Sat, Mar 31, 2007 11:34:14 +0200: > > If you can remind me of patches that are "must have"s for 1.5.1 > that I've missed, that would be very nice. We've broken "git > am" and "git rebase" (without --merge) on 'master' branch for > people who has i18n contents after 1.5.0 but they should be > fixed now. We still have absolutely broken merge-recursive WRT rename/rename conflicts in intermediate trees. > Please, remember that the key word for this weekend is "make > 1.5.1 NO WORSE than 1.5.0". IOW, the focus is on obvious > regression fixes. It is "no worse", but doesn't "pretty bad" count?