From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-explain Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:00:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20061205210010.GF26702@fieldses.org> References: <200612031701.15594.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <7v1wngwws6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwt57j94c.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061205035721.GA26735@fieldses.org> <7v1wnekh6a.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Junio C Hamano , Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GrhPc-00020I-Cf for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:01:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031395AbWLEVAT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:00:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031384AbWLEVAT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:00:19 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:44022 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031360AbWLEVAO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:00:14 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GrhOc-0000Xk-MC; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:00:10 -0500 To: Johannes Schindelin Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:55:49PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > >> ... > > >> > [PATCH] git-explain > > >> > ... > > >> > > >> What about calling it git-whatsup instead? > > > > > > No, clearly it should be git-wtf. > > > > Should I take these responses to mean that you two are negative > > about the approach [...] > > I think they just were in the mood for some slashdot style > unimportant-aspects-in-a-funny-way discussion. Yeah, I was just being silly, apologies.