From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:51:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20061108145157.GU20017@pasky.or.cz> References: <7v8ximwrm3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v8ximwrm3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ghomc-0005uY-HC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:52:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965899AbWKHOwA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:52:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965900AbWKHOwA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:52:00 -0500 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:43171 "EHLO machine.or.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965899AbWKHOv7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:51:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 7193 invoked by uid 2001); 8 Nov 2006 15:51:57 +0100 To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org > By the way, do people mind if I start to rewind and rebase > 'next' after every feature release (i.e. tagged release is > made after 'master')? I do not feel a strong need for it, and > 'git log --no-merges master..next' will show emptiness > eventually, but being able to restart from clean slate after a > release would be somewhat nice. It would be annoying for me since I can't mantain a long-term private branch tracking next then (and I prefer next to master). I don't do that right now but I've done that shortly in the past and it would be nice to have that possibility in the future as well. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i