From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:24:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1161478005.9241.210.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021212645.2f9ba751.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1161487417.9241.220.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021233014.d4525a1d.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022100028.GQ75501@over-yonder.net> <20061022074422.50dcbee6.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022130322.GS75501@over-yonder.net> <20061022092845.233deb43.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022133336.GT75501@over-yonder.net> <20061022094041.77c06cc7.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022135702.GU75501@over-yonder.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 22 16:25:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbeG5-0004hw-Ej for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:25:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750928AbWJVOY6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:24:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750956AbWJVOY6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:24:58 -0400 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp08.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.168]:4160 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP08.CEZ.ICE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928AbWJVOY5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:24:57 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP08.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:33:40 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbdJv-00011f-4z; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:24:55 -0400 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-Id: <20061022102454.b9dea693.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20061022135702.GU75501@over-yonder.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2006 14:33:40.0609 (UTC) FILETIME=[1179E710:01C6F5E7] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:57:02 -0500 "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > You keep insisting that there's a PROBLEM here. You're right, I don't > see one. I KNOW the numbers only refer to a branch, I KNOW that when > you're talking about a different branch the numbers are meaningless, > and I'm perfectly fine with that because referring to revisions on *A* > branch is exactly what I USE the numbers for. Light goes on. Okay. So a bzr "branch" is only ever editable on a single machine. So there is no distributed development on top of a bzr "branch". Everyone else just has read-only copies of it. In this way you ensure that there is never a conflict of the revno's. I'm not sure of the ramifications of this but at least I get where you're coming from now. Sean From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:24:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20061022102454.b9dea693.seanlkml__19614.2076900744$1161527145$gmane$org@sympatico.ca> References: <1161478005.9241.210.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021212645.2f9ba751.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1161487417.9241.220.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021233014.d4525a1d.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022100028.GQ75501@over-yonder.net> <20061022074422.50dcbee6.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022130322.GS75501@over-yonder.net> <20061022092845.233deb43.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022133336.GT75501@over-yonder.net> <20061022094041.77c06cc7.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061022135702.GU75501@over-yonder.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sun Oct 22 16:25:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Received: from esperanza.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.173]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbeGj-0004qi-S9 for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:25:42 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=esperanza.ubuntu.com) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbeG6-0000o0-0h; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:25:02 +0100 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp08.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.168] helo=BAYC1-PASMTP08.CEZ.ICE) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbeG2-0000nb-Ci for bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:24:58 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP08.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:33:40 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbdJv-00011f-4z; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:24:55 -0400 To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-Id: <20061022102454.b9dea693.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20061022135702.GU75501@over-yonder.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2006 14:33:40.0609 (UTC) FILETIME=[1179E710:01C6F5E7] X-BeenThere: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar-ng discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Archived-At: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:57:02 -0500 "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > You keep insisting that there's a PROBLEM here. You're right, I don't > see one. I KNOW the numbers only refer to a branch, I KNOW that when > you're talking about a different branch the numbers are meaningless, > and I'm perfectly fine with that because referring to revisions on *A* > branch is exactly what I USE the numbers for. Light goes on. Okay. So a bzr "branch" is only ever editable on a single machine. So there is no distributed development on top of a bzr "branch". Everyone else just has read-only copies of it. In this way you ensure that there is never a conflict of the revno's. I'm not sure of the ramifications of this but at least I get where you're coming from now. Sean