From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:30:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20061021233014.d4525a1d.seanlkml__10280.2026238807$1161487839$gmane$org@sympatico.ca> References: <45357CC3.4040507@utoronto.ca> <4536EC93.9050305@utoronto.ca> <87lkncev90.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <453792A8.1010700@utoronto.ca> <878xjc2qeb.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <453803E6.2060309@utoronto.ca> <87ods727pn.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <45382120.9060702@utoronto.ca> <87irie1wvv.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <20061021130111.GL75501@over-yonder.net> <87ac3p1jn7.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <1161472030.9241.174.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021192539.4a00cc3e.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1161478005.9241.210.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061021212645.2f9ba751.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1161487417.9241.220.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sun Oct 22 05:30:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Received: from esperanza.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.173]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbU2m-0002kN-3X for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:30:36 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=esperanza.ubuntu.com) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbU2X-0008Cn-1Q; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:30:21 +0100 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp08.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.168] helo=BAYC1-PASMTP08.CEZ.ICE) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbU2U-0008Ci-1g for bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:30:18 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP08.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:38:59 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbT6N-0002qZ-0m; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:30:15 -0400 To: Jeff Licquia Message-Id: <20061021233014.d4525a1d.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <1161487417.9241.220.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2006 03:38:59.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[9C427C60:01C6F58B] X-BeenThere: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar-ng discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Archived-At: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:23:37 -0400 Jeff Licquia wrote: > > The archives have all the posts of people claiming that there were no > > issues with revno's and fully distributed models. > > "revno's"? Which "revno's"? ... > > OK. So you are conflating the two. Could someone who isn't comment? No, actually i'm not. Single revno's or your dotted revno's _both_ have the same property. They can only be local data and can not guarantee stability in a fully distributed environment. Sean