From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:23:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20061021102346.9cd3abce.seanlkml__45117.5057831735$1161440669$gmane$org@sympatico.ca> References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <45345AEF.6070107@utoronto.ca> <200610171030.35854.jnareb@gmail.com> <20061017073839.3728d1e7.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <20061021141328.GE29843@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu Moy , Jakub Narebski X-From: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sat Oct 21 16:24:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Received: from esperanza.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.173]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbHls-0007eC-MG for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:24:20 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=esperanza.ubuntu.com) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbHlb-0003YU-Tv; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:24:04 +0100 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp11.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.171] helo=BAYC1-PASMTP11.CEZ.ICE) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GbHlO-0003Y3-78 for bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:23:53 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP11.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 07:32:38 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbGpG-0001kU-Ph; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:23:46 -0400 To: Jan Hudec Message-Id: <20061021102346.9cd3abce.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20061021141328.GE29843@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2006 14:32:38.0468 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2063040:01C6F51D] X-BeenThere: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar-ng discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Archived-At: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:13:28 +0200 Jan Hudec wrote: > Bzr is meant to be used in both ways, depending on user's choice. > Therefore it comes with that infrastructure and you can choose whether > you want to use it or not. >>From what we've read on this thread, bzr appears to be biased towards working with a central repo. That is the model that supports the use of revnos etc that the bzr folks are so fond of. However Git is perfectly capable of being used in any number of models, including centralized. Git just doesn't make the mistake of training new users into using features that are only stable in a limited number of those models. Sean