From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:18:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <200610170119.09066.jnareb@gmail.com> <45346290.6050300@utoronto.ca> <200610171120.09747.jnareb@gmail.com> <1161078035.9020.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1161124078.9020.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 18 01:18:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZyCr-0004pc-VT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:18:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751087AbWJQXSm (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:18:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751088AbWJQXSl (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:18:41 -0400 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp05.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.165]:46621 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP05.bayc1.hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087AbWJQXSk (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:18:40 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP05.bayc1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:18:39 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxGg-0007XQ-F9; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:18:38 -0400 To: Robert Collins Message-Id: <20061017191838.1c36499b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <1161124078.9020.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2006 23:18:39.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[946750C0:01C6F242] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:27:58 +1000 Robert Collins wrote: > Be as blunt as you want. You're expressing an opinion, and thats fine. I > happen to think that we're right : users appear to really appreciate > this bit of the UI, and I've not yet seen any evidence of confusion > about it - though I will admit there is the possibility of that > occurring. Yeah, but it's an opinion that is based on a huge real world project with hundreds of developers. If Bazaar is ever used in a project of that size it may just see the same type of issues as Bk. As has been mentioned elsewhere, Git users really appreciate the short forms it provides for referencing commits, so much so that there is no reason to invent a new (unstable) numbering system or attempt to hide the true underlying commit identities. Just out of curiosity is there a Bazaar repo of the Linux kernel available somewhere? Sean From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:18:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20061017191838.1c36499b.seanlkml__27169.9432204061$1161334600$gmane$org@sympatico.ca> References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <200610170119.09066.jnareb@gmail.com> <45346290.6050300@utoronto.ca> <200610171120.09747.jnareb@gmail.com> <1161078035.9020.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1161124078.9020.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski X-From: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Fri Oct 20 10:56:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Received: from esperanza.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.173]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaqB5-0003pb-Ii for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:56:31 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=esperanza.ubuntu.com) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GapNM-0007lS-8P; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:05:08 +0100 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp05.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.165]) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GZyCn-0003fl-96 for bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:18:42 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP05.bayc1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:18:39 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxGg-0007XQ-F9; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:18:38 -0400 To: Robert Collins Message-Id: <20061017191838.1c36499b.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <1161124078.9020.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2006 23:18:39.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[946750C0:01C6F242] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:04:04 +0100 X-BeenThere: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar-ng discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Archived-At: On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:27:58 +1000 Robert Collins wrote: > Be as blunt as you want. You're expressing an opinion, and thats fine. I > happen to think that we're right : users appear to really appreciate > this bit of the UI, and I've not yet seen any evidence of confusion > about it - though I will admit there is the possibility of that > occurring. Yeah, but it's an opinion that is based on a huge real world project with hundreds of developers. If Bazaar is ever used in a project of that size it may just see the same type of issues as Bk. As has been mentioned elsewhere, Git users really appreciate the short forms it provides for referencing commits, so much so that there is no reason to invent a new (unstable) numbering system or attempt to hide the true underlying commit identities. Just out of curiosity is there a Bazaar repo of the Linux kernel available somewhere? Sean