From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:35:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <45340713.6000707@utoronto.ca> <45345AEF.6070107@utoronto.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aaron Bentley , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 17 12:35:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZmIf-0000Z8-03 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:35:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161187AbWJQKfw (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:35:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161189AbWJQKfw (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:35:52 -0400 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp11.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.171]:19881 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP11.CEZ.ICE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161187AbWJQKfv (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:35:51 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP11.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:44:34 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZlMT-0005MC-Hv; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:35:49 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin Message-Id: <20061017063549.da130b5f.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2006 10:44:34.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[3BFAB080:01C6F1D9] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:30:27 +0200 (CEST) Johannes Schindelin wrote: > It would also make things slow as hell. How do you deal with something > like annotate in such a setup? Some commands like annotate might not make any sense in such a set up. But one way to get the same (perhaps even better) feature into git would be to support shallow clones, in which case even annotate would continue to work even if somewhat crippled by the lack of a complete history. Sean From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:35:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20061017063549.da130b5f.seanlkml__22659.4742890031$1161331475$gmane$org@sympatico.ca> References: <9e4733910610140807p633f5660q49dd2d2111c9f5fe@mail.gmail.com> <45340713.6000707@utoronto.ca> <45345AEF.6070107@utoronto.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Fri Oct 20 10:04:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Received: from esperanza.ubuntu.com ([82.211.81.173]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GapMW-0002TW-O8 for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:04:16 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=esperanza.ubuntu.com) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GapMV-0007Wv-IX; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:04:15 +0100 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp11.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.171] helo=BAYC1-PASMTP11.CEZ.ICE) by esperanza.ubuntu.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GZmIa-000282-DP for bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:35:52 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [65.93.43.81] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Received: from linux1.attic.local ([65.93.43.81]) by BAYC1-PASMTP11.CEZ.ICE over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:44:34 -0700 Received: from guru.attic.local ([10.10.10.28]) by linux1.attic.local with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZlMT-0005MC-Hv; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:35:49 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin Message-Id: <20061017063549.da130b5f.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2006 10:44:34.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[3BFAB080:01C6F1D9] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:04:03 +0100 X-BeenThere: bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar-ng discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-ng-bounces@lists.canonical.com Archived-At: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:30:27 +0200 (CEST) Johannes Schindelin wrote: > It would also make things slow as hell. How do you deal with something > like annotate in such a setup? Some commands like annotate might not make any sense in such a set up. But one way to get the same (perhaps even better) feature into git would be to support shallow clones, in which case even annotate would continue to work even if somewhat crippled by the lack of a complete history. Sean