git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Karl Hasselström" <kha@treskal.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:11:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060215101136.GB26911@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F2445A.6020109@citi.umich.edu>

On 2006-02-14 15:58:02 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:

> Karl Hasselström wrote:
>
> > No, I literally want the opposite of "stg commit", so that the
> > sequence "stg commit; stg uncommit" has zero net effect.
>
> well, that would work OK for maintainers, but would be kind of
> strange for folks who are pulling from such a repository. how would
> that work?

I didn't plan to publish branches where this kind of history munging
was being done. It's precisely like "git rebase" in that regard --
it's a tool for cleaning up history before it is published.

> my impression of git is that you don't change stuff that's already
> committed. you revert changes by applying a new commit that backs
> out the original changes.

You don't change stuff that's already committed _and published_ (well,
except for pu branches :-). Rewriting history is perfectly OK up until
the moment someone has pulled your branch.

> i'm speculating, but i suspect that's why there's a "stg pick
> --reverse" and not a "stg uncommit."

I don't think I've been very successful in communicating exactly what
I want "stg uncommit" for. It's not that I want to undo a committed
change -- what I want is to transform it into an stgit patch so that I
can edit it with a minimum of effort.

  $ edit edit edit
  $ git-commit -a -m "create foo"
  $ edit edit edit
  $ git-commit -a -m "improve foo"
  $ edit edit edit
  $ git-commit -a -m "improve bar"

  # Oops, I realize that the "create foo" changeset had a debug
  # printout left in it, and I wasn't already using stgit.

  $ stg init
  $ stg uncommit improve-bar improve-foo create-foo
  $ stg stg pop --to=create-foo
  $ edit --remove=debug-printout
  $ stg refresh
  $ stg push --all

Similar use-cases for e.g. reordering commits, merging commits,
deleting one commit in the middle of a chain of good ones, etc. are
easy to come up with. The point is that stgit alreay handles all this,
_but only if you have been using stgit from the start_. What "stg
uncommit" does is basically to import (linear) git history into stgit,
where a powerful toolset exists to edit it.

You can actually do this today; just create a new branch where you
want your new stgit stack to be based, and "stg pick" the
commits/patches from the old branch:

  $ git-checkout -b new-branch HEAD^^^
  $ stg init
  $ stg pick old-branch^^^ -n create-foo
  $ stg pick old-branch^^ -n improve-foo
  $ stg pick old-branch^ -n improve-bar
  $ git-branch -D old-branch
  $ git-checkout -b old-branch
  $ git-branch -d new-branch

This series of commands also converts the top three commits to stgit
patches, and leaves the user on the same branch where she started (it
does _exactly_ the same job as "stg uncommit improve-bar improve-foo
create-foo"), but it's a lot of work, and a typo could lose commits.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-15 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-10 19:59 [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT Shawn Pearce
2006-02-10 20:41 ` Greg KH
2006-02-10 21:04   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-10 23:20     ` Greg KH
2006-02-10 21:17 ` Petr Baudis
2006-02-10 21:38   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-10 21:47     ` Petr Baudis
2006-02-10 22:07       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-13 21:00   ` Petr Baudis
2006-02-14  9:26     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-14 10:08       ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-14 15:22         ` Chuck Lever
2006-02-14 16:07           ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-14 20:58             ` Chuck Lever
2006-02-14 22:29               ` Petr Baudis
2006-02-15  0:22                 ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-15  0:35                   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-15  1:14                     ` Petr Baudis
2006-02-15  4:11                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-15  6:54                       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-15 19:45                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-16 10:24                         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-16 10:33                           ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-16 10:42                             ` Fernando J. Pereda
2006-02-16 10:52                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-02-16 11:10                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-15 17:25                 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-16  7:54                   ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-17  4:27                   ` [PATCH 0/2] stg uncommit Karl  Hasselström
2006-02-17  4:31                     ` [PATCH 1/2] Update .git/refs/heads/base after patch deletion Karl  Hasselström
2006-02-17  4:31                     ` [PATCH 2/2] Add 'stg uncommit' command Karl  Hasselström
2006-02-19 10:51                       ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-19 13:45                         ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-19 14:47                           ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-19 21:15                             ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-20 17:20                             ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-20 17:30                               ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-20 22:49                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-21  7:55                                   ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-15 10:11               ` Karl Hasselström [this message]
2006-02-15 10:42                 ` [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT Andreas Ericsson
2006-02-15 11:25                   ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-15 11:27                     ` Karl Hasselström
2006-02-17 21:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-13  2:49 ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-13  3:29   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-13  4:40     ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-13  6:03       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-13 14:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-14  4:56   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-14  6:14     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-02-15 17:20       ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-15 17:12     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-02-15 17:55       ` Shawn Pearce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060215101136.GB26911@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk \
    --to=kha@treskal.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).