git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Cc: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>,
	David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>,
	dwheeler@dwheeler.com, Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge?
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:01:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050420070157.GA12584@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050419105008.GB12757@pasky.ji.cz>


* Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> wrote:

> > I think pull is pull.  If you are doing lots of local stuff and do not
> > want it overwritten, it should have been in a forked branch.
> 
> I disagree. This already forces you to have two branches (one to pull 
> from to get the data, mirroring the remote branch, one for your real 
> work) uselessly and needlessly.
> 
> I think there is just no good name for what pull is doing now, and 
> update seems like a great name for what pull-and-merge really is. Pull 
> really is pull - it _pulls_ the data, while update also updates the 
> given tree. No surprises.

yeah. In fact most of the times i did 'git pull pasky' in the past, the 
'merge' phase was unsuccessful, and i had to nuke the tree and recreate 
it.  All i did with the snapshots was to build them, so there were no 
local changes. Waiting a couple of days with doing a 'git pull pasky', 
or installing Linus' tree is a sure way to break the merging.

e.g. to reproduce the last such failure i had today, do:

 cd git-pasky-base
 echo 8568e1a88c086d1b72b0e84ab24fa6888b5861b9 > .git/HEAD
 read-tree $(tree-id $(cat .git/HEAD))
 checkout-cache -a -f
 make
 make install           # make sure to use the older tools
 rm -rf .git/objects
 git pull pasky

and i get:

 [...]
 fatal: unable to execute 'gitmerge-file.sh'
 fatal: merge program failed

        Conflicts during merge. Do git commit after resolving them.

note that with earlier versions of pasky, i had other merge conflicts.  
Sometimes there were .rej files, sometimes some sort of script failure.  
So it seems rather unrobust at the moment. Especially if i happen to 
install Linus' tree and try to sync the pasky tree with those tools.

another thing: it's confusing that during 'git pull', the rsync output 
is not visible. Especially during large rsyncs, it would be nice to see 
some progress. So i usually use a raw rsync not 'git pull', due to this.

yet another thing: what is the canonical 'pasky way' of simply nuking 
the current files and checking out the latest tree (according to 
.git/HEAD). Right now i'm using a script to:

  read-tree $(tree-id $(cat .git/HEAD))
  checkout-cache -a

(i first do an 'rm -f *' in the working directory)

i guess there's an existing command for this already?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-20  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-16  1:56 [PATCH] Add "clone" support to lntree Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-16  2:47 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-16  2:58   ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-16  3:16     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-16 11:39       ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-16  3:17     ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-16 23:33       ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-17  0:07         ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-19  1:12           ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19  2:13             ` Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge? David A. Wheeler
2005-04-19  9:18               ` David Greaves
2005-04-19  9:28                 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 10:05                   ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-19 10:50                     ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-19 13:54                       ` Jon Seymour
2005-04-19 14:40                       ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-19 18:28                       ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-19 22:39                         ` David A. Wheeler
2005-04-19 23:20                           ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-20  7:01                       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-04-20 20:05                         ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-20 20:32                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-20 20:45                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-20 21:15                             ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-20 23:58                               ` David Mansfield
2005-04-16  3:06   ` Add "clone" support to lntree Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-16 23:00     ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-16 23:07       ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-04-16 23:44         ` Petr Baudis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050420070157.GA12584@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=david@dgreaves.com \
    --cc=dwheeler@dwheeler.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).