From: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:43:47 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1e3958576e2a132180f8c5d20acc1315d3062119.1642092230.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <pull.1114.git.1642092230.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> For sparse-checkouts, we don't want unpack-trees to error out on files that are missing from the worktree, so there has traditionally been logic to make it skip the verify_uptodate() check for these. Unfortunately, it was skipping the verify_uptodate() check for files that were expected to *become* SKIP_WORKTREE. For files that were not already SKIP_WORKTREE, that can cause us to later delete the file in apply_sparse_checkout(). Only skip the check for files that were already SKIP_WORKTREE as well to avoid lightly discarding important changes users may have made to files. Note 1: unpack-trees.c is already a bit complex, and the logic around CE_SKIP_WORKTREE and CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE in that file are no exception. I also tried just replacing CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE with CE_SKIP_WORKTREE in the verify_uptodate() check instead of checking for both flags, and found that it also fixed this bug and passed all the tests. I also attempted to devise a few testcases that might trip either variant of my fix and was unable to find any problems. It may be that just checking CE_SKIP_WORKTREE is a better fix, but I'm not sure. I thought it was a bit safer to strictly reduce the number of cases where we skip the up-to-date check rather than just toggling which kind of cases skip it, and thus went with the current variant of the fix. Note 2: I also wondered if verify_absent() might have a similar bug, but despite my attempts to try to devise a testcase that would trigger such a thing, I couldn't find any problematic testcases. Thus, this patch makes no attempt to apply similar changes to verify_absent() and verify_absent_if_directory(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> --- t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh | 2 +- unpack-trees.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh b/t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh index 1b2395b8a82..4ed0885bf2f 100755 --- a/t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh +++ b/t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ test_expect_success 'read-tree will not throw away dirty changes, non-sparse' ' grep -q dirty init.t ' -test_expect_failure 'read-tree will not throw away dirty changes, sparse' ' +test_expect_success 'read-tree will not throw away dirty changes, sparse' ' echo "/*" >.git/info/sparse-checkout && read_tree_u_must_succeed -m -u HEAD && diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c index 98e2f2e0e6f..6d9d89c662a 100644 --- a/unpack-trees.c +++ b/unpack-trees.c @@ -2059,7 +2059,9 @@ static int verify_uptodate_1(const struct cache_entry *ce, int verify_uptodate(const struct cache_entry *ce, struct unpack_trees_options *o) { - if (!o->skip_sparse_checkout && (ce->ce_flags & CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE)) + if (!o->skip_sparse_checkout && + (ce->ce_flags & CE_SKIP_WORKTREE) && + (ce->ce_flags & CE_NEW_SKIP_WORKTREE)) return 0; return verify_uptodate_1(ce, o, ERROR_NOT_UPTODATE_FILE); } -- gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 16:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-13 16:43 [PATCH 0/5] Remove the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE class of bugs (for sparse-checkouts) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] t1011: add testcase demonstrating accidental loss of user modifications Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget [this message] 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] repo_read_index: clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit from files present in worktree Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 16:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] Accelerate clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files() by caching Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-13 23:35 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Remove the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE class of bugs (for sparse-checkouts) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] t1011: add testcase demonstrating accidental loss of user modifications Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-02-16 8:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:02 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] repo_read_index: clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit from files present in worktree Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-02-16 8:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:08 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-19 1:06 ` Jonathan Nieder 2022-02-19 16:42 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-19 18:14 ` Jonathan Nieder 2022-02-20 5:28 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-20 16:56 ` Derrick Stolee 2022-02-22 23:17 ` Jonathan Nieder 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Update documentation related to sparsity and the skip-worktree bit Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-02-16 9:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:21 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-14 15:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Accelerate clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files() by caching Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2022-01-15 1:39 ` Victoria Dye 2022-02-16 9:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 2022-02-16 16:30 ` Elijah Newren 2022-02-17 4:40 ` Elijah Newren 2022-01-15 1:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Remove the present-despite-SKIP_WORKTREE class of bugs (for sparse-checkouts) Victoria Dye
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1e3958576e2a132180f8c5d20acc1315d3062119.1642092230.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \ --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \ --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lessleydennington@gmail.com \ --cc=newren@gmail.com \ --cc=stolee@gmail.com \ --cc=vdye@github.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/5] unpack-trees: fix accidental loss of user changes' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).