From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D731F462 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 20:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726689AbfE1U0V (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 16:26:21 -0400 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:17210 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726481AbfE1U0V (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 16:26:21 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45D52y2BdYz5tlB; Tue, 28 May 2019 22:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB39208D; Tue, 28 May 2019 22:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] userdiff: add Octave To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Boxuan Li , git@vger.kernel.org, avarab@gmail.com, philipoakley@iee.org References: <20190518034623.87702-1-liboxuan@connect.hku.hk> <3b7a22e8-0310-3738-0476-b6d73f187331@kdbg.org> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <1c31f3fc-9283-91ef-7c96-6eed2f010491@kdbg.org> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 22:26:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 28.05.19 um 18:37 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Johannes Sixt writes: > >> Junio will very likely appreciate if you resend with these fixes applied. > > Heh, thanks, for spotting, but this round has already been in 'next' > so any updates should be done incrementally X-<. > I don't terribly mind the small grammatic weakness and the style violation. No further action required from my point of view. -- Hannes