From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6DC1F464 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729856AbfIKSLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:11:12 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:62945 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729603AbfIKSLM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:11:12 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46T92644Gzz5tlD; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:11:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82E8146; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] git-gui: Add hotkeys to set widget focus To: Pratyush Yadav Cc: Birger Skogeng Pedersen , Git List , davvid@gmail.com, Bert Wesarg References: <20190903214942.ubcbdgtphpwnaxs6@yadavpratyush.com> <20190904143055.11400-1-birger.sp@gmail.com> <20190910191217.qgb23x5tvaajppfh@yadavpratyush.com> <20190911174813.3v2f4s7wxolkkyef@yadavpratyush.com> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <1b330dd0-9daa-b178-4725-2b0257090dc2@kdbg.org> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:11:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190911174813.3v2f4s7wxolkkyef@yadavpratyush.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 11.09.19 um 19:48 schrieb Pratyush Yadav: > Since this entire debate essentially boils down to personal preference, > there is no clear answer. So I'll just go with the author's > implementation. Fair enough. -- Hannes