From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96322021E for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752270AbcKOTqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:46:09 -0500 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:63418 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928AbcKOTqH (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:46:07 -0500 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3tJHv15tGTz5tlL; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:46:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4F613E; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:46:04 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demand To: Brandon Williams References: <1479172735-698-1-git-send-email-bmwill@google.com> <1479172735-698-2-git-send-email-bmwill@google.com> <4a72ad14-0a8f-ede9-9f54-601fcd37740b@kdbg.org> <20161115172909.GA66382@google.com> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <1aeed608-ee6e-0f10-2ce0-2f264d2f23e6@kdbg.org> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:46:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161115172909.GA66382@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 15.11.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Brandon Williams: > I'm assuming the reason we want to avoid sub-shells is > for performance reasons right? Yes, every fork() saved is a win on Windows. (No pun intended ;) -- Hannes