From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk, git@vger.kernel.org,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] apply: reload .gitattributes after patching it
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:52:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18fcc7db-7c09-3fbf-1e3f-81be99f4bb17@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190820024505.GH365197@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
Hi Brian
On 20/08/2019 03:45, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2019-08-19 at 09:41:42, Phillip Wood wrote:
>> Hi Brian
>>
>> On 18/08/2019 19:44, brian m. carlson wrote:
>>> When applying multiple patches with git am, or when rebasing using the
>>> am backend, it's possible that one of our patches has updated a
>>> gitattributes file. Currently, we cache this information, so if a
>>> file in a subsequent patch has attributes applied, the file will be
>>> written out with the attributes in place as of the time we started the
>>> rebase or am operation, not with the attributes applied by the previous
>>> patch. This problem does not occur when using the -m or -i flags to
>>> rebase.
>>
>> Do you know why -m and -i aren't affected?
>
> I had to look, but I believe the answer is because they use the
> sequencer, and the sequencer calls git merge-recursive as a separate
> process, and so the writing of the tree is only done in a subprocess,
> which can't persist state.
The sequencer has been running in a single process for a while now. We
do fork for 'git merge' sometimes when processing 'merge' commands but
'pick' commands are all done in a single process by calling
do_recursive_merge().
Best Wishes
Phillip
> Should we move the merge-recursive code into the main process, we'll
> likely have the same problem there.
>
>>> diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
>>> index cde95369bb..d57bc635e4 100644
>>> --- a/apply.c
>>> +++ b/apply.c
>>> @@ -4643,6 +4643,7 @@ static int apply_patch(struct apply_state *state,
>>> struct patch *list = NULL, **listp = &list;
>>> int skipped_patch = 0;
>>> int res = 0;
>>> + int flush_attributes = 0;
>>> state->patch_input_file = filename;
>>> if (read_patch_file(&buf, fd) < 0)
>>> @@ -4670,6 +4671,10 @@ static int apply_patch(struct apply_state *state,
>>> patch_stats(state, patch);
>>> *listp = patch;
>>> listp = &patch->next;
>>> +
>>> + if ((patch->new_name && ends_with_path_components(patch->new_name, GITATTRIBUTES_FILE)) ||
>>> + (patch->old_name && ends_with_path_components(patch->old_name, GITATTRIBUTES_FILE)))
>>> + flush_attributes = 1;
>>
>> style nit - these lines are very long compared to 80 characters
>
> They are. They aren't two different from other lines in the file, and I
> thought that leaving them that way would preserve the similarities, but
> I can also wrap them. I'll send out a v5 with wrapped lines.
>
>>> diff --git a/convert.c b/convert.c
>>> index 94ff837649..030e9b81b9 100644
>>> --- a/convert.c
>>> +++ b/convert.c
>>> @@ -1293,10 +1293,11 @@ struct conv_attrs {
>>> const char *working_tree_encoding; /* Supported encoding or default encoding if NULL */
>>> };
>>> +static struct attr_check *check;
>>
>> I was concerned about the impact adding a file global if we ever want to
>> multi-thread this for submodules, but looking through the file there are a
>> couple of others already so this isn't creating a new problem.
>>> +
>>> static void convert_attrs(const struct index_state *istate,
>>> struct conv_attrs *ca, const char *path)
>>> {
>>> - static struct attr_check *check;
>>> struct attr_check_item *ccheck = NULL;
>>> if (!check) {
>>> @@ -1339,6 +1340,12 @@ static void convert_attrs(const struct index_state *istate,
>>> ca->crlf_action = CRLF_AUTO_INPUT;
>>> }
>
> The portion I've included above demonstrates that this was already a
> static variable, just one hidden in a function. So yeah, this is no
> worse than it already was.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-20 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-09 10:02 [PATCH] apply: reload .gitattributes after patching it brian m. carlson
2019-08-09 11:14 ` Taylor Blau
2019-08-09 11:25 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-09 11:36 ` Jeff King
2019-08-09 11:47 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-09 12:43 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-08-09 13:51 ` Jeff King
2019-08-09 22:08 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Honor .gitattributes with rebase --am brian m. carlson
2019-08-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] path: add a function to check for path suffix brian m. carlson
2019-08-12 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-12 1:10 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-12 4:36 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-08-12 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-12 22:40 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-13 1:13 ` Jeff King
2019-08-13 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-13 6:36 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-08-13 16:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-11 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] apply: reload .gitattributes after patching it brian m. carlson
2019-08-13 2:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Honor .gitattributes with rebase --am brian m. carlson
2019-08-13 2:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] path: add a function to check for path suffix brian m. carlson
2019-08-13 2:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] apply: reload .gitattributes after patching it brian m. carlson
2019-08-13 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-15 22:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-16 0:22 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-13 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-13 22:48 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-18 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Honor .gitattributes with rebase --am brian m. carlson
2019-08-18 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] path: add a function to check for path suffix brian m. carlson
2019-08-18 18:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] apply: reload .gitattributes after patching it brian m. carlson
2019-08-19 9:41 ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-19 9:55 ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-20 3:05 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-20 8:56 ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-20 2:45 ` brian m. carlson
2019-08-20 8:52 ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2019-08-20 18:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-20 18:32 ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-26 15:09 ` Phillip Wood
2019-08-26 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18fcc7db-7c09-3fbf-1e3f-81be99f4bb17@gmail.com \
--to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).