From: Ben Keene <seraphire@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Ben Keene via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-p4: [usability] yes/no prompts should sanitize user text
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:26:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179dd921-d9d0-d26d-33e9-3664bf97fcc2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqimmptazs.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 12/9/2019 5:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Ben Keene via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> From: Ben Keene <seraphire@gmail.com>
>>
>> When prompting the user interactively for direction, the tests are
>> not forgiving of user input format.
>>
>> For example, the first query asks for a yes/no response. If the user
>> enters the full word "yes" or "no" or enters a capital "Y" the test
>> will fail.
>>
>> Create a new function, prompt(prompt_text, choices) where
>> * promt_text is the text prompt for the user
>> * is a list of lower-case, single letter choices.
>> This new function must prompt the user for input and sanitize it by
>> converting the response to a lower case string, trimming leading and
>> trailing spaces, and checking if the first character is in the list
>> of choices. If it is, return the first letter.
>>
>> Change the current references to raw_input() to use this new function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Keene <seraphire@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> +def prompt(prompt_text, choices = []):
>> + """ Prompt the user to choose one of the choices
>> + """
>> + while True:
>> + response = raw_input(prompt_text).strip().lower()
>> + if len(response) == 0:
>> + continue
>> + response = response[0]
>> + if response in choices:
>> + return response
> I think this is a strict improvement compared to the original, but
> the new loop makes me wonder if we need to worry more about getting
> EOF while calling raw_input() here. I am assuming that we would get
> EOFError either way so this is no worse/better than the status quo,
> and we can keep it outside the topic (even though it may be a good
> candidate for a low-hanging fruit for newbies).
That is a good catch. What should we expect the default behavior
to be in these two questions if the EOFError occurs? I would think
that we should extend this to an abort of the process?
> response = prompt("Submit template unchanged. Submit anyway? [y]es, [n]o (skip this patch) ", ["y", "n"])
> response = prompt("[s]kip this commit but apply the rest, or [q]uit? ", ["s", "q"])
Should a quit be added to the first prompt and have those be the
defaults on EOFError?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 14:16 [PATCH 0/3] git-p4: Usability enhancements Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] git-p4: [usability] yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-10 14:26 ` Ben Keene [this message]
2019-12-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] git-p4: [usability] RCS Keyword failure should suggest help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] git-p4: [usability] Show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-09 22:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] git-p4: Usability enhancements Junio C Hamano
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-11 11:52 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-11 11:59 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-11 11:29 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-11 9:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Luke Diamand
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 " Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 1:45 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-13 13:42 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-13 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-15 20:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-12-16 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-16 19:11 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 22:54 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-16 13:53 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 20:39 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Junio C Hamano
2019-12-21 10:19 ` Luke Diamand
2019-12-25 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-02 13:50 ` Ben Keene
2020-01-02 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179dd921-d9d0-d26d-33e9-3664bf97fcc2@gmail.com \
--to=seraphire@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).