git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] worktree add: sanitize worktree names
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:44:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550749488.30307.2@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8AERM==LunYTszUf1Fb-uHPZLjkSE5x1T=0Ueqsvq3F_A@mail.gmail.com>



On Чт, Feb 21, 2019 at 2:38 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:28 PM Konstantin Kharlamov 
> <hi-angel@yandex.ru> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  On Чт, Feb 21, 2019 at 2:00 PM,
>>  =?UTF-8?b?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>  > Worktree names are based on $(basename $GIT_WORK_TREE). They 
>> aren't
>>  > significant until 3a3b9d8cde (refs: new ref types to make 
>> per-worktree
>>  > refs visible to all worktrees - 2018-10-21), where worktree name 
>> could
>>  > be part of a refname and must follow refname rules.
>>  >
>>  > Update 'worktree add' code to remove special characters to follow
>>  > these rules. The code could replace chars with '-' more than
>>  > necessary, but it keeps the code simple. In the future the user 
>> will
>>  > be able to specify the worktree name by themselves if they're not
>>  > happy with this dumb character substitution.
>>  >
>>  > Reported-by: hi-angel@yandex.ru
>>  > Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>>  > ---
>>  >  builtin/worktree.c      | 47
>>  > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  >  t/t2025-worktree-add.sh |  5 +++++
>>  >  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  >
>>  > diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
>>  > index 3f9907fcc9..ff36838a33 100644
>>  > --- a/builtin/worktree.c
>>  > +++ b/builtin/worktree.c
>>  > @@ -262,6 +262,46 @@ static void validate_worktree_add(const char
>>  > *path, const struct add_opts *opts)
>>  >       free_worktrees(worktrees);
>>  >  }
>>  >
>>  > +/*
>>  > + * worktree name is part of refname and has to pass
>>  > + * check_refname_component(). Remove unallowed characters to 
>> make it
>>  > + * valid.
>>  > + */
>>  > +static void sanitize_worktree_name(struct strbuf *name)
>>  > +{
>>  > +     int i;
>>  > +
>>  > +     /* no ending with .lock */
>>  > +     if (ends_with(name->buf, ".lock"))
>>  > +             strbuf_remove(name, name->len - strlen(".lock"),
>>  > +                           strlen(".lock"));
>>  > +
>>  > +     /*
>>  > +      * All special chars replaced with dashes. See
>>  > +      * check_refname_component() for reference.
>>  > +      */
>>  > +     for (i = 0; i < name->len; i++) {
>>  > +             if (strchr(":?[]\\~ \t@{}*/.", name->buf[i]))
>>  > +                     name->buf[i] = '-';
>>  > +     }
>>  > +
>>  > +     /* remove consecutive dashes, leading or trailing dashes */
>>  > +     for (i = 0; i < name->len; i++) {
>>  > +             while (name->buf[i] == '-' &&
>>  > +                    (i == 0 ||
>>  > +                     i == name->len - 1 ||
>>  > +                     (i < name->len - 1 && name->buf[i + 1] == 
>> '-')))
>>  > +                     strbuf_remove(name, i, 1);
>>  > +     }
>>  > +
>>  > +     /* last resort, should never ever happen in practice */
>>  > +     if (name->len == 0)
>>  > +             strbuf_addstr(name, "worktree");
>> 
>>  I assume this means a user have passed a zero-sized worktree name? 
>> But
>>  zero-sized file/directory names are not possible anyway, would it 
>> make
>>  sense to just return an error in this case?
> 
> It could happen if you do "git worktree add .lock". The ".lock" part
> will be stripped out, leaving us with an empty string.

Ah, I see. Then, would it maybe make sense to just sanitize the ".lock" 
out the same way as you did with special symbols, i.e. with dashes?

(I am not a git developer, so not sure if that's a good question, but I 
would also question why ".lock" needs to be deleted. I guess git uses 
the postfix internally, but why can't it be okay with "name.lock.lock")



  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-21 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-18 14:36 git gc fails with "unable to resolve reference" for worktree hi-angel
2019-02-18 15:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-02-18 15:09   ` hi-angel
2019-02-18 15:18     ` Duy Nguyen
2019-02-20 14:34       ` hi-angel
2019-02-21 11:00 ` [PATCH] worktree add: sanitize worktree names Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-02-21 11:28   ` Konstantin Kharlamov
2019-02-21 11:38     ` Duy Nguyen
2019-02-21 11:44       ` Konstantin Kharlamov [this message]
2019-02-21 11:52         ` Duy Nguyen
2019-02-21 13:23           ` Jeff King
2019-02-21 12:19   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-02-21 12:19     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-02-21 13:22       ` Jeff King
2019-02-21 17:41       ` Ramsay Jones
2019-02-22  9:21         ` Duy Nguyen
2019-02-26 10:58     ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-02-26 10:58       ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-02-27 12:08         ` Jeff King
2019-02-27 14:23           ` Eric Sunshine
2019-02-27 16:04             ` Jeff King
2019-03-03  1:22               ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-04 11:19               ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-04 12:04                 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-04 15:06         ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-03-05 12:08       ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-03-05 12:08         ` [PATCH v4 1/2] refs.c: refactor check_refname_component() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-03-06 21:49           ` Jeff King
2019-03-07 23:24             ` Eric Sunshine
2019-03-05 12:08         ` [PATCH v4 2/2] worktree add: sanitize worktree names Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-03-08  9:28         ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-03-08  9:28           ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2019-03-10  2:02             ` Eric Sunshine
2019-03-11  6:20               ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-11  9:24                 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-11 22:39                   ` Jeff King
2019-03-12  6:32                     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-11  6:36             ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-11  9:27               ` Duy Nguyen
2019-03-11 13:05             ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-03-12  6:45               ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1550749488.30307.2@yandex.ru \
    --to=hi-angel@yandex.ru \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).