From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9531FC44 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 21:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751089AbdEHV1f (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 17:27:35 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:36073 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750839AbdEHV1e (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 17:27:34 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id x188so8635915itb.3 for ; Mon, 08 May 2017 14:27:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VYqXXtWfLXk0qYYtPx67pBiuvrnwhU0iac2znCIpjpo=; b=s+XhHqgfg3G0e2UHuHnrDTA0iJqntjrf/IBOZ0+apoge08pGBuWlIoiJDBNL1nIGbq 60YL5KCS2X7y4L2PeX0QF7L04sZNMkdN5oqoPw07dG97BhXcwX6rlXwvSQfwNRdWWF8y MEdX2yxcI2t7D+l2KXIXQhQGDYsEzaYRPob1MCtZClK84RLEl5NubnVK3p6ski+Fad42 sZlIhZgmCTrl3qOumfJbxGz3QWLZ6wG5jZ7ZW/L3gqiaaMZabs30T1PtFUA0dyk17BJk GZnySCWbsijV0Ilh+FeEXetIfYHOKsusKhcDvdrMdazR80HuAH/SM1GoUzRULCn9ASU2 tA9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VYqXXtWfLXk0qYYtPx67pBiuvrnwhU0iac2znCIpjpo=; b=RNVlaaMhTpUxpTUtAj7ChwuDH+EwK1a6J5uHjsURw98P8jOU1CUzxNGmY6kGewNCKX oRWwW98qs5XyBlfsvvLD1O9ieRm5jwlR6OTySJbmrJrTxqbF28buARwXutagwDRGfOMQ w9wmdLDaiY5e45fDd3YzbzBeRQs2Y+AOLLl8t+gNQf+VQdcGMOYKCC15aPIY5qs6PqXL KWkZwbGYz7++D6vsspMfhp46CRIk/5Ph1uUYRpuj4iETzzrn9+Uc9u0hWbfW0nDeZLjs 7UsMVmouA7rU3s0CJvJQPtEDPMvZGe3raLbu6d3dPop4yFSBFp91ltPIINsY0zkFrCqP oyag== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5S05i7hfYJgXWgeda+sZBAAZpnj30lPuOIiSH96Rs+Sn2cgM1n wO6dtW7/CO9hww== X-Received: by 10.36.111.205 with SMTP id x196mr23325339itb.117.1494278853760; Mon, 08 May 2017 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atris (24-212-246-46.cable.teksavvy.com. [24.212.246.46]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y96sm5141143ita.9.2017.05.08.14.27.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 May 2017 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1494278850.32697.4.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] rebase -i: add config to abbreviate command-names From: Liam Beguin To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 17:27:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20170502040048.9065-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> <1493769381.29673.39.camel@gmail.com> <1494177195.32697.2.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 09:27 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Liam Beguin writes: > > > Sorry for the delay, I don't mind switching to C but it would probably > > be easier to see if the scripted version gets approved first. > > If it does, I could then get started on the C implementation. > > If you prefer I could also forget about the scripted version, make a C > > implementation work and see if that gets approved. > > I am not sure what "approved" would mean in the context of this > project, though ;-) Your patch to the scripted version would > certainly not be in the upcoming release.  If you define the > "approval" as "it is queued to my tree somewhere", the patch would > start its life like everybody else by getting merged to the 'pu' > branch, where there already is a topic that removes the code you > patch your enhancement into. > By "approved", I guess I meant the list reaches an agreement. > The list _can_ agree that it is a good idea to have an option to > populate the todo list with shortened insn words from the beginning > (instead of merely accepting a short-hand while executing), which is > what your patch wants to do, without actually having the updated > scripted "rebase -i" merged in any of the integration branches in my > tree.  If you meant by "approval" to have such a list concensus, I > think you may already have one.  I personally do not think it is a > great idea but I do not think it is a horrible one, either.  As long > as it is an opt-in feature that many people find useful (which may > be the case already, judging from the list traffic), I do not mind > ;-) > Ok, based on this, I'll send a new series based on the 'pu' branch. Thanks again, Liam