Re: "git subtree --squash" interacts poorly with revert, merge, and rebase

[Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>]

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 19:07 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Maybe we would never hit any of these problems in practice, but they
> give me a bad enough feeling that I'm planning to write my own tool
> that tracks the upstream commit ID in a file (like a submodule) and
> doesn't generate any extra commits.  Without generating extra commits,
> the only place to store the upstream content in the superproject would
> be in another subtree, which would take up disk space in every working
> tree unless developers manually set skip-worktree.  I think I prefer to
> not store the upstream content and just have the tool fetch it from a
> local subproject repository each time it's needed.
> 
> I'll of course post the tool on the web and would be happy to see it
> integrated into "git subtree" if that makes sense, but I don't know how
> much time I'd be willing to put into making that happen.

I have named my tool "git subtree-lite" and posted it here:

https://mattmccutchen.net/utils/git-subtree-lite.git/

For now, please email any bug reports, enhancement requests, or
proposed patches to me.  I have philosophical concerns about hosting my
own projects on services I don't control and practical concerns about a
 few "forge" apps that I looked into installing on my own web site, but
if people are seriously interested in collaborating on this, I'll work
something out.

Matt