From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC31203E2 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754295AbcG0Kxv (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:53:51 -0400 Received: from relay3.ptmail.sapo.pt ([212.55.154.23]:53113 "EHLO sapo.pt" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752930AbcG0Kxv (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:53:51 -0400 Received: (qmail 4563 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2016 10:53:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 5206 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2016 10:53:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO catarina) (vascomalmeida@sapo.pt@[85.246.157.91]) (envelope-sender ) by ptmail-mta-auth02 (qmail-ptmail-1.0.0) with ESMTPA for ; 27 Jul 2016 10:53:41 -0000 X-PTMail-RemoteIP: 85.246.157.91 X-PTMail-AllowedSender-Action: X-PTMail-Service: default Message-ID: <1469616819.1858.25.camel@sapo.pt> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i18n: notes: mark comment for translation From: Vasco Almeida To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:53:39 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1469283027-23055-1-git-send-email-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> <1469535400-9242-1-git-send-email-vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.4 (3.20.4-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org A Ter, 26-07-2016 às 09:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano escreveu: > Vasco Almeida writes: > > > > > + strbuf_add_commented_lines(&buf, "\n", > > strlen("\n")); > > + strbuf_add_commented_lines(&buf, _(note_template), > > strlen(_(note_template))); > > + strbuf_add_commented_lines(&buf, "\n", > > strlen("\n")); > > Hmm, do we really need to make three separate calls? This patch does (1) # # Write/edit the notes for the following object: # The original source does (2) # # Write/edit the notes for the following object: How do we want, (1) or (2) ?