git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] upload-pack-2: Implement the version 2 of upload-pack
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 14:56:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462215375.4123.69.camel@twopensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kavBUohoMcC3iEws5mVBQ6HZsR=HyBoxM1jxUVJ6Z1jkA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 10:51 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:43 AM, David Turner <
> dturner@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 16:34 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > > In upload-pack-2 we send each capability in its own packet
> > > buffer.
> > > The construction of upload-pack-2 is a bit unfortunate as I would
> > > like
> > > it to not be depending on a symlink linking to upload-pack.c, but
> > > I
> > > did
> > > not find another easy way to do it. I would like it to generate
> > > upload-pack-2.o from upload-pack.c but with '
> > > -DTRANSPORT_VERSION=2'
> > > set.
> > 
> > Couldn't we check argv[0] and use that to determine protocol?  Then
> > we
> > could symlink executables rather than source code.
> 
> IIRC I proposed a similar thing earlier, i.e.
> 
>     if (argv[0] ends with 2)
>         do_protocol_v_2(...)
> 
> but that may break (and confuse a lot!) some use cases.
> `git fetch` has the documented --upload-pack switch, so as a server
> -admin
> you are free to have git-upload-pack linking to
> "git-upload-pack-2.8" but additionally you still have
> "git-upload-pack-1.7" or "git-upload-pack-custom-2".
> 
> so I think we should not do that :(
> I do like to symlink the executables though.

I think it would probably not break anyone if the new executable name
were sufficiently distinctive -- e.g. starts_with (strrchr(argv[0],
'/'), "git-upload-pack-protocol-v2"). But it would make custom
executables a bit more complicated for the future.

I guess it is better to have silly source code but clean binaries than
clean source code but silly user-visible rules.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-02 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29 23:34 [WIP PATCH 00/14] Protocol v2 patches Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 01/14] upload-pack: make client capability parsing code a separate function Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] upload-pack.c: Refactor capability advertising Stefan Beller
2016-04-30  1:04   ` David Turner
2016-05-04 20:05   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] upload-pack-2: Implement the version 2 of upload-pack Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 17:43   ` David Turner
2016-05-02 17:51     ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 18:56       ` David Turner [this message]
2016-05-03  0:31         ` Duy Nguyen
2016-05-04 20:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] connect: rewrite feature parsing to work on string_list Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 18:18   ` David Turner
2016-05-02 18:46     ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-04 20:13   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-17 22:23     ` David Turner
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] transport: add infrastructure to support a protocol version number Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] remote.h: add get_remote_capabilities, request_capabilities Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 18:57   ` David Turner
2016-05-03  5:33     ` Jeff King
2016-05-03 21:21       ` David Turner
2016-05-04 16:44         ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] fetch-pack: move capability selection out of do_fetch_pack Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] fetch-pack: factor out get_selected_capabilities_list Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 19:09   ` David Turner
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] fetch-pack: Add negotiate_capabilities Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] do_fetch_pack: select capabilities for transport version 1 only Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] builtin/fetch-pack: add argument for transport version Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] Add test for fetch-pack Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 19:45   ` David Turner
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] WIP add test for git pull Stefan Beller
2016-04-29 23:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] WIP test git fetch Stefan Beller
2016-05-02 20:41 ` [WIP PATCH 00/14] Protocol v2 patches David Turner
2016-05-02 20:43   ` Stefan Beller
2016-05-24 22:46 ` David Turner
2016-05-24 23:03   ` Duy Nguyen
2016-05-25 16:45     ` David Turner
2016-05-25 16:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-25 19:31     ` David Turner
2016-05-25 21:29   ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462215375.4123.69.camel@twopensource.com \
    --to=dturner@twopensource.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).