From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: thaddeus <t-tcambron@trxtraining.com>
Subject: Naming Conventions for Branches
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1310495085285-6576242.post@n2.nabble.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 12 20:24:51 2011
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1Qghdb-0000Gy-9n
	for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:24:51 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754751Ab1GLSYq (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:24:46 -0400
Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]:51940 "EHLO sam.nabble.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753704Ab1GLSYq (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:24:46 -0400
Received: from jim.nabble.com ([192.168.236.80])
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <t-tcambron@trxtraining.com>)
	id 1QghdV-0004h1-9b
	for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:24:45 -0700
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/176963>

Is it common to have a different name for each branch, descriptive of the
project is contains or is it more common to have one dedicated name (for
instance QA2) for the branch on which projects change based on need. 
Best

--
View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Naming-Conventions-for-Branches-tp6576242p6576242.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.