From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Heidelberg Subject: [PATCH 0/6] send-email threading fixes Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:49:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1244803766-7785-1-git-send-email-markus.heidelberg@web.de> References: <7vd49afjbv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Witten , Thomas Rast , Markus Heidelberg To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 12 12:49:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MF4KU-0001Hm-Ba for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:49:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754852AbZFLKtk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:49:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753944AbZFLKtk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:49:40 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:39387 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752548AbZFLKtj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:49:39 -0400 Received: from smtp08.web.de (fmsmtp08.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.216]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AC81053DC41; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:49:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [89.59.124.123] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #277) id 1MF4KK-0003TK-00; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:49:40 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.6.3.2.236.ge505d In-Reply-To: <7vd49afjbv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Sender: markus.heidelberg@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19SJms28bUvSUcO27cmk7HggMKGiyjTAHQP//Fq AJjkyvG8+oEDG4UULxyh15CmdVgCM1fJrfsr9qWoL2cr9nisql t27ouE1DhCehChRq3iCQ== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, 12.06.2009: > Markus Heidelberg writes: > > > HTH and I got everything explained correctly. > > Now, you can summarize the series with a proper [0/6], perhaps modelling > after how I explained the order of application and merge structure ;-). OK, I'll try :) For easier understanding I kept the wording from your reshuffled series. [PATCH 1/6] add a test for git-send-email for non-threaded mails [PATCH 2/6] send-email: fix non-threaded mails [PATCH 3/6] doc/send-email: clarify the behavior of --in-reply-to with --no-thread [PATCH 4/6] add a test for git-send-email for threaded mails without chain-reply-to [PATCH 5/6] send-email: fix threaded mails without chain-reply-to [PATCH 6/6] send-email: fix a typo in a comment The first three patches apply to the tip of 'maint', which is currently at 94af7c3 (Documentation: git-send-mail can take rev-list arg to drive format-patch, 2009-06-11). The first one exposes breakage introduced by 3e0c4ff and then the second one fixes it. The last three patches apply to the tip of 'master'. Patch 4/6 exposes breakage introduced by 15da108, patch 5/6 fixes it. Changes compared to 'pu': * adjusted the description of 2/6 to hopefully add less confusion * changed the order of 4/6 and 5/6 and applied 5/6 directly on top of 4/6, since the regression was immediately noticable * also change test_expect_failure to test_expect_success in 5/6 then * instead of in the former merge commit a6f8abc "Merge branch 'mh/master-send-email-threaded-fix' into mh/master-send-email"