From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707F71F9F4 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242816AbhKRGJr (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:09:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42716 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241659AbhKRGJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:09:44 -0500 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 965D6C061570 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from aiailu.local (unknown [82.64.96.64]) (Authenticated sender: thomas.koutcher@online.fr) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B13C13F838; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:06:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=online.fr; s=smtp-20201210; t=1637215602; bh=M9eIY+I9xuEP6sqig1OfZRlB2MJorg8IifwE7nlBYXc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xu6g0sTTbRM3YwG50VoY1GkeDKAgjgOxq64lnu50v9Pz9AYRFy4FYK++SLZlIEJvZ +Y0X3fgaVaebknnU6QLlwKCpke61tuczm+RQ9mVSVKVVcJe6069AQ7wBrk5nhKZTG9 1xhofx0kvKeazJ8nB8rZpq3h9U745Szj5sox0zsVl5uaoq2bJXNMunJWvahP7g2nsh zB1H8vNOaKG0EAVMjfuiU+2jdf7vqrWSpZYsA5E/LxhapcjLtqNlAnZsNRPPHcG+cI nvzGsALwykasBXli4mB4ZqTQJS6KJ8L5uZb3XQxGk+dJxo5RwBtV3K1QU70YDYrg3Z Er3B1h43e194A== Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] subtree: force merge commit To: git@vger.kernel.org References: From: Thomas Koutcher Message-ID: <0ef32d3e-7b0c-3458-7edd-1eb6a3067a83@online.fr> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:06:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Le 18/11/2021 à 05:53, Junio C Hamano a écrit : > Reviewed-by: is a bit tricky. If you are sending a corrected > version after other people just took a look at a previous iteration, > you cannot generally have them for two reasons. First of all, they > haven't said that you can have Reviewed-by: under there name (which > means that they are completely satisfied after giving a thorough > analysis). Also, the version you are sending is different from what > they reviewed, so even if they were happy with the previous iteration, > it does not mean they would be with this version. Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the confusion I created.