From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:44:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d38ec8e-3f4b-c0fb-ba6f-e2cef39e4db4@jeffhostetler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f207bc28-a303-5d63-e9f4-da8e4d466bd5@kdbg.org>
On 9/8/2018 2:31 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 08.09.2018 um 11:26 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
>> Am 07.09.2018 um 20:19 schrieb Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget:
>>> diff --git a/compat/mingw.c b/compat/mingw.c
>>> index 858ca14a57..ef03bbe5d2 100644
>>> --- a/compat/mingw.c
>>> +++ b/compat/mingw.c
>>> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int mingw_open_append(wchar_t const
>>> *wfilename, int oflags, ...)
>>> * FILE_SHARE_WRITE is required to permit child processes
>>> * to append to the file.
>>> */
>>> - handle = CreateFileW(wfilename, FILE_APPEND_DATA,
>>> + handle = CreateFileW(wfilename, FILE_WRITE_DATA | FILE_APPEND_DATA,
>>> FILE_SHARE_WRITE | FILE_SHARE_READ,
>>> NULL, create, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL);
>>> if (handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
>>>
>>
>> I did not go with this version because the documentation
>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/fileio/file-access-rights-constants
>> says:
>>
>> FILE_APPEND_DATA: For a file object, the right to append data to the
>> file. (For local files, write operations will not overwrite existing
>> data if this flag is specified without FILE_WRITE_DATA.) [...]
>>
>> which could be interpreted as: Only if FILE_WRITE_DATA is not set, we
>> have the guarantee that existing data in local files is not
>> overwritten, i.e., new data is appended atomically.
>>
>> Is this interpretation too narrow and we do get atomicity even when
>> FILE_WRITE_DATA is set?
>
> Here is are some comments on stackoverflow which let me think that
> FILE_APPEND_DATA with FILE_WRITE_DATA is no longer atomic:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20093571/difference-between-file-write-data-and-file-append-data#comment29995346_20108249
>
>
> -- Hannes
Yeah, this whole thing is a little under-documented for my tastes.
Let's leave it as you have it. I'll re-roll with a fix to route
named pipes to the existing _wopen() code.
thanks
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 18:19 [PATCH 0/2] Fixup for js/mingw-o-append Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-07 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a windows named pipe Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-09 7:28 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2018-09-10 13:21 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-09-07 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-08 9:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-09-08 18:31 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-09-10 15:44 ` Jeff Hostetler [this message]
2018-09-10 16:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-10 16:55 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-09-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fixup for js/mingw-o-append Jeff Hostetler
2018-09-10 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-10 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a windows named pipe Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-10 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-10 19:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-09-10 20:07 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-09-10 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-11 14:25 ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-09-11 20:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Fixup for js/mingw-o-append Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-11 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a windows named pipe Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2018-09-11 20:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d38ec8e-3f4b-c0fb-ba6f-e2cef39e4db4@jeffhostetler.com \
--to=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).