From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726521F8C8 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343874AbhIQLVu (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:21:50 -0400 Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com ([216.75.62.102]:37537 "EHLO gourmet8.spamgourmet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243123AbhIQLVo (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:21:44 -0400 Received: from spamgourmet by gourmet7.spamgourmet.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRBuo-0006xK-HP for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:20:22 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by gourmet7.spamgourmet.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mRBun-0006wm-U8 for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:20:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1631877620; bh=LDP697TbG3fNscG9mvvL1LIycg37WMfOR5xE2gmkhSc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Reply-To:To:From:Subject:Date; b=L8zGc1Ok7uzGEOwbCz0I5cboLE3Rcqd0chKIygJy4oZVR5RpFA4uc+oejLngtEwOf Ecy02b0I0/kww5e2dOrugZb0OWiqBseqqNPNN7MrTpxmIZyJWMBbqUfsbg8iAMVnSf lENTqVamA2BvP0fnMqBAL3kiqKYVeLzek6BBleaM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.8.8] ([92.117.161.117]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAwbz-1mcQBR0QJd-00BKGc; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:20:20 +0200 Reply-To: gitmailinglist.bentolor@xoxy.net To: git@vger.kernel.org From: gitmailinglist.bentolor@xoxy.net Subject: Should `@` be really a valid git tag name? Message-ID: <0c68d628-e093-1cbd-e3bd-38a827545418@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:20:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cTGKSy9OstkUAGeBbNo4EXrvKGTor8gvmq5BS4Os2iO6hIEfJSh BzH5LiehMVrCw64jXC9ys1jM60M/V9nPDHkt/grcoD3jG6lQrIFC9ff3PmdHEkHcbCoa5wx /9bcxMVVUB73tK6tvfGIB5U3XSmFzDqKh5oY2ghttRyDac6x2I2J7zND9S6JpGMj5DYrK26 /4RiU61qAHvKCZAWnoMFg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:FGokVQxG1/4=:z5j4cuQkMNWWmsL/OlvHS1 hKYafSAcegeUvRJ3TcLWkHok8w+gjsgxnUxV6q4mY6cEQXJog3TuaXN2YJqmdROIU+jqdESr3 pm1ZiExCuEusQlrpNSplP/TgqCTHAA40wEU2dDkMc2KbKXbu53gSrxBsGIAI0sas5ypoJI+fx z5sDLwED0A1B+WaGfDBSJf1REIDQV6oYb0pdedM+/P7anFbH3mFgFINc1Qz//mCpsuNjS4lN1 Sk3sVNpWzhgra/T8PmOzDSe7lkzW80OLNFMxg/EmsIfFpOwRgd69piOwyXb433pBzDU9u4A+H pq0sbl6i5BNM2W6H/6M24UIQM2d+CFsaEl4vcPCYkb6MZ919m2qgJjvIWv148WP8Z8Vpmip2u yCscJUwmuGhtckVsRHrddpgpZaR3OrMLA8nl+8Codx//przHgewbYS47cZVGexZe8XQKU1g34 +LSD0uALg+kTWhUmrkQBy+RTtbDP9PTvrqYkbas6Ai4kLSw8lvIKA9xKZXpEeoBgR6MecwV6S LweL39Rbm4ceU3U+pYWCcd7EpO9YTYZGaKG67nOIKty30VAHyi2x2bKVIvy3Yq+zwSdL/hM/O 1eF7KJ7KIzThWyW4kl1VOEF3cTfkp4KGzUMchgXryaPi3a65OOnMsnhfwk02/WQkLu8RRXfoj 99XxjK/qxTfn1gH+pFeYFUDYpTueqSjpgd3DCV8N2iwpuPTLrsLm1ATHKrhGGed1jOjEFCPN8 Kk8uWyESp2VsF+kJgz0km0u8YsHeYIewQ/C6e31XMtSz9WC1eJDbnEIJL10XVTBGJXZgPBOBJ cX4ypV+L/5nC5/ENmjeYUvGlmJVY/XN4q7fI2MywUMMuhglMckePDauBMyNYsr+883t4N20W7 oEq9WD33FvhTZnyuNzTkXBiJ98TaTv3yRcga/aihkVbKgpscL2e5E0h6BksdFdjjUFS5AEbD6 iPu8+YRYfq76O7e8DA1mAfrTc6KzFDtzg0xYauGB7vghgXerQvAfFeyl9Yc5WwuX/kSSeTIeT GANbdmoe0PmOf+6PfqYvf2IA1BwjStNRWTya7RjnRehsCutLIeiPfcxw864mkFoizUht/+B+y dXAM9tjJcnzxOo= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hello Git-Community, by accident I did: git tag -a -s @ git push --tags in v2.25.1 and pushed the tag named `@` to Github and had some minutes of fun to get rid of it again (see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/69211383) A SO commenter pointed out, that git-check-ref-format forbids @ and maybe I should report this as potential bug. Is it? Best, Benjamin P.S.: I'm not subscribed, so please CC me.