From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF4120985 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938417AbcIYWit (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 18:38:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:36380 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933709AbcIYWis (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 18:38:48 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id b184so11490114wma.3 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:38:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOqxtz0cfY9QNiMuH3YCVhEgiVv15seOiEfBBxcQlb0=; b=w5zhp19HdDVuSL9TMLrZsM6cvEUrsvNQblGa9udKCsjdxTGnLmJyg2n2O1bO0nlUvC aSOnUXkBY8zDPZniqxQ5XDSpef7fPdf6GMUJ9vyzxEJWtvp8oG0m5pcRern2VoydtZHX bAkYdTiF8FnQS4Oo6XwogWCdyWx7DX5Se973Nx2DyLLPJ8pkJpxtGOpz9Fp6EMivxM/P CpfyRbQ0E4hXN7URmWpF0sp4xLKGXAlR3k6ZKWkXYLoL8s6UHMEa3S0fEQeCl0C97jMZ EdnO1lrz9smHEqXuSiXR3cF9Jy10KwiVR/tXrhCQYIPFnjZl96uX1Y7ko2BbrSHOCn4p 9SvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOqxtz0cfY9QNiMuH3YCVhEgiVv15seOiEfBBxcQlb0=; b=hEMFG266xZv64UiUOO8nV0SiE2YA4o8Q1DJI9IZDUQg4auG1nVYTrNa+j56mTMYCiy ibcfocmGvvlFYJd5bHUuk6edB9wSQddoYDi7bUdJvx3XPKiMr36OnuBNeFVBd9PZSLqV 9ZwhNzEAUhcIOuKjE48JeeluhJnz9rsxK7xs+duM07bm45f7D9Jon3CGWZqweeAnESDx 48pn4jLHdVh2Sn6z7kHda5PgCO3tgMj63LW095rtQkm8rcMo6IuGFmGX8rXep1p7iRKN R600IyMoNywCEWo/SjbAo6sivLp2mwVzEBowPB4qgr9OH7MvAaDrm+XQXBOiqPYTeFLW pJgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwM8NIhxqXXgKXdK4D6WnilUgd4pJpOPviM9zNleouurI0cn7Xwi3u12YxhtIEdRCg== X-Received: by 10.194.81.106 with SMTP id z10mr15099492wjx.140.1474843126995; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (dbd108.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.23.29.108]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id xb6sm19074496wjb.30.2016.09.25.15.38.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mailinfo: unescape quoted-pair in header fields To: Kevin Daudt , Jeff King References: <20160916210204.31282-1-me@ikke.info> <20160919185440.18234-3-me@ikke.info> <20160921110934.f6eu2dz6i2mlpa45@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160923041540.5fvl6ytp2tvcflsk@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160925201713.GA6937@ikke.info> Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Swift Geek From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jakub_Nar=c4=99bski?= Message-ID: <0b6cbc53-e058-f064-59e8-b73203f3e400@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:38:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160925201713.GA6937@ikke.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org W dniu 25.09.2016 o 22:17, Kevin Daudt pisze: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:15:41AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: >> Oops, yes. It is beginning to make the "strbuf_swap()" look less >> convoluted. :) >> > > I've switched to strbuf_swap now, much better. I've implemented > recursive parsing without looking at what you provided, just to see what > I'd came up with. Though I've not implemented a recursive descent > parser, but it might suffice. I think you can implement a parser handling proper nesting of parens without recursion. Though... what is the definition in the RFC? -- Jakub Narębski