From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538691F5AE for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 07:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230103AbhFKHE4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:04:56 -0400 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:30114 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229530AbhFKHEz (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 03:04:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.98] (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G1Wy61lmBz5tlC; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:02:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xdiff: make diff3 the default conflictStyle To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Jeff King , Felipe Contreras , David Aguilar , Sergey Organov , Bagas Sanjaya , Elijah Newren , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Denton Liu , git@vger.kernel.org References: <20210609192842.696646-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20210609192842.696646-8-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <60883e1b-787f-5ec2-a9af-f2f6757d3c43@kdbg.org> <638a0500-459a-a25b-afca-904ec0e09866@kdbg.org> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <07ef3a3b-4812-4fa1-c60c-b9085a268bc3@kdbg.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:02:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 11.06.21 um 08:43 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Johannes Sixt writes: > >> But I would estimate that most conflicts (in absolute number among all >> developers using Git) arise during rebase operations and cherry-picking, >> i.e., while one is working on their own code. In such sitations, the >> simpler conflict markup is sufficient, because one knows the background >> and reason of the conflicts. > > "rebase -i" to reorganize one's own series would be a prime example > of "conflicts you need to resolve in code that is purely your own > and nobody else's", and cherry-picking used while reorganizing one's > own series falls into the same category. I agree that a simpler > markup would be more appropriate in such cases. > > Rebasing to catch up with updated upstream is a different story, > though. The same for cherry-picking an earlier change to an updated > upstream. I've reflected on this a bit more as well. I've forgotten about the "catch up with someone else" case. That is certainly helped by diff3 style. I retract my opposition and am now neutral to a potential change of default. (I still don't endorse it because it upsets my workflow.) The case that inner conflicts are presented sub-optimally under diff3 remains, though. -- Hannes