From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D839A1F516 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751054AbeFZVA1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:00:27 -0400 Received: from bsmtp7.bon.at ([213.33.87.19]:25189 "EHLO bsmtp7.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942AbeFZVA1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:00:27 -0400 Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp7.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41FdjP2Dr9z5tlG; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:00:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5EE1CBC; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:00:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/29] t: use test_must_fail() instead of checking exit code manually To: Eric Sunshine Cc: Elijah Newren , Git List , Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder , =?UTF-8?Q?SZEDER_G=c3=a1bor?= , Stefan Beller , Jonathan Tan References: <20180626073001.6555-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com> <20180626073001.6555-18-sunshine@sunshineco.com> <29d090a2-bbe4-0d87-6dda-037ae675d4a3@kdbg.org> From: Johannes Sixt Message-ID: <07314f8f-e242-b9b9-fd20-7e1ef8df8e47@kdbg.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:00:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 26.06.2018 um 20:14 schrieb Eric Sunshine: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:06 PM Johannes Sixt wrote: >> Hence, these lines should actually be >> >> p4 help client && >> ! p4 help nosuchcommand > > Thanks for the comment; you're right, of course. I'll certainly make > this change if I have to re-roll for some other reason, but do you > feel that this itself is worth a re-roll? Not worth a re-roll IMO. -- Hannes