From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E941F506 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232046AbiIVTDO (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:03:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230241AbiIVTDN (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:03:13 -0400 Received: from elephants.elehost.com (elephants.elehost.com [216.66.27.132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B225F963F for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mazikeen (cpebc4dfb928313-cmbc4dfb928310.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.228.251.108] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by elephants.elehost.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 28MJ33kT071942 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:03:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rsbecker@nexbridge.com) Reply-To: From: To: , References: <022e01d8ceb5$c2da52c0$488ef840$@nexbridge.com> In-Reply-To: <022e01d8ceb5$c2da52c0$488ef840$@nexbridge.com> Subject: RE: [BUG] Git 2.38.0-rc1 t1800 message text comparison Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:02:59 -0400 Organization: Nexbridge Inc. Message-ID: <023101d8ceb5$f1c28850$d54798f0$@nexbridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AdjOtdo9mObKgbHpRkyfW3iShvKnNA== Content-Language: en-ca Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On September 22, 2022 3:02 PM, I wrote: >Rc1 is looking good except for this test. > >We get a diff as follows: > >-fatal: cannot run bad-hooks/test-hook: ... >+fatal: cannot exec 'bad-hooks/test-hook': Permission denied > >It looks like the pattern >sed -e s/test-hook: .*/test-hook: .../ > >needs to be a bit extended. Adding > >sed -e s/exec/run/ | send -e s/["']//g > >might help clear off the other noise. The subject should have been 2.38.0, not 2.28.0.