From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AE41F8C6 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351895AbhIHO1R (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:27:17 -0400 Received: from elephants.elehost.com ([216.66.27.132]:46879 "EHLO elephants.elehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351908AbhIHO1L (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:27:11 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at elehost.com Received: from gnash (cpe00fc8d49d843-cm00fc8d49d840.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [173.33.197.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by elephants.elehost.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 188EQ0kw003072 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:26:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rsbecker@nexbridge.com) From: "Randall S. Becker" To: "'Christoph Hellwig'" Cc: "'Junio C Hamano'" , "'Neeraj Singh'" , "'Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget'" , "'Git List'" , "'Johannes Schindelin'" , "'Jeff King'" , "'Jeff Hostetler'" , "=?iso-8859-1?Q?'=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0_Bjarmason'?=" , "'Neeraj K. Singh'" References: <20210908064958.GA29073@lst.de> <006d01d7a4b9$7cea64c0$76bf2e40$@nexbridge.com> <20210908141322.GA27146@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20210908141322.GA27146@lst.de> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/6] Implement a batched fsync option for core.fsyncObjectFiles Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:25:55 -0400 Message-ID: <007b01d7a4bd$72921730$57b64590$@nexbridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQEuszLZPnOzWuI9JhEj5nYbH7e2rgGns2uvAVb0vKQCG+V6CgJYIiLUAsQ+7yQA9Po3dQJmrDc/rH9/pIA= Content-Language: en-ca Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On September 8, 2021 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Implement a batched fsync option for core.fsyncObjectFiles > >On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:57:34AM -0400, Randall S. Becker wrote: >> possible. I know of at least 3 operating systems where that is a bad >> plan, and if you did, you would take the test suite down while you were at it. > >I've just mentioned a good way to write a test for this feature on a specific platform. This is absolutely no judgement if that is a good plan >on other platforms. Thank you for the clarification. I do appreciate it. -Randall