From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA831F453 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727069AbfBHMX0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:23:26 -0500 Received: from elephants.elehost.com ([216.66.27.132]:17194 "EHLO elephants.elehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726465AbfBHMX0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:23:26 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at elehost.com Received: from gnash (CPE00fc8d49d843-CM00fc8d49d840.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.229.179.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by elephants.elehost.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x18CNOTf063711 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:23:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rsbecker@nexbridge.com) From: "Randall S. Becker" To: Subject: [Hang] t5562 subtest 8 on NonStop Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:23:17 -0500 Message-ID: <002301d4bfa9$158716e0$409544a0$@nexbridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01D4BF7A.EBC2BB30"; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQJ0O8qAfP94YPcwq/am/NdqSl5t4A== Content-Language: en-ca Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi All, We have suddenly encountered a hung git-http-backend in t5562 in the NonStop port. This is a new problem not seen before on the platform, surprisingly. I am wondering whether this is a result of not actually having an apache2 server on-board. Is that a possibility and can that sub-test be bypassed if no apache2 is detected? We also had subtest 15 and I am investigating, but it may depend on 8's data (I had to kill the git-http-backend process, so maybe that's why). Thanks, Randall