From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA41020248 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727901AbfBYQFm (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:05:42 -0500 Received: from elephants.elehost.com ([216.66.27.132]:51683 "EHLO elephants.elehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727733AbfBYQFm (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:05:42 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at elehost.com Received: from gnash (CPE00fc8d49d843-CM00fc8d49d840.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.229.179.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by elephants.elehost.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1PG5cNh037927 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:05:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rsbecker@nexbridge.com) From: "Randall S. Becker" To: "'Junio C Hamano'" , Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.21.0 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:05:31 -0500 Message-ID: <000801d4cd23$f24e8a90$d6eb9fb0$@nexbridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0020_01D4CCEC.04FFFB20"; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQHPzoQfbsePaA70x5Dm/jFx3eZEKA== Content-Language: en-ca Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Just some good news. We have two platform variants in NonStop to worry about (soon to be three). Our testing is being conducted on the oldest and slowest (J-series) so that we catch whatever we can. 2.21.0 one is still testing 2.21.0 in our Jenkins instance on J-series but is looking consistent with rc2 (although we're just entering the scary tests area 5300-5599). The newer L-series machines had no trouble at all and passed (other than the usual t9001 and t9020 which won't work on platform anyway). Test time was about 9 hours on our L-series machine compared with 50-ish on the J-series. Thanks for the hard work everyone!