From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA7201F5AE for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpGYo-0001Kf-RW for normalperson@yhbt.net; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:36:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpGYk-0001KT-Fw for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:36:50 -0400 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:48118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpGYi-0004PG-0k for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:36:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255521600BC; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ovZm3C1-fwkm; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8730416010D; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9Dv5UOqm8p8N; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com [172.91.119.151]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 616B91600BC; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: put appropriate license notices in source files To: Eric Blake References: <13090550.mNDUoA7e8v@omega> <20210604202552.52xlrdzdwpebnrdi@redhat.com> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:36:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210604202552.52xlrdzdwpebnrdi@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=131.179.128.68; envelope-from=eggert@cs.ucla.edu; helo=zimbra.cs.ucla.edu X-Spam_score_int: -47 X-Spam_score: -4.8 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.59, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bruno Haible , bug-gnulib@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" On 6/4/21 1:25 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Speaking of tools, should we include SPDX tags alongside the full text > of all our licenses, as that is yet another thing that aids > license-checking tools? That's not a job I'd care to take on, for reasons I discussed for tzdb last year (see the last paragraph): https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2020-June/029122.html