From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS22989 209.51.188.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5920D1F6A9 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 17:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfq5Q-0005Z5-TF for normalperson@yhbt.net; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:50:16 -0500 Received: from eggsout.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54070 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfq5N-0005Yy-8K for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:50:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfq5K-0004YB-23 for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:50:13 -0500 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:52016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gfq5J-0004WF-Se for bug-gnulib@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:50:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33143160F62; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 09:50:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id sMaFenQdeYGj; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 09:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685A7160F73; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 09:50:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id W85jOt9DEEVN; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 09:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 468B0160E4A; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 09:50:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: cmake support To: Andrew Pennebaker , bug-gnulib@gnu.org References: From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 09:49:59 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: bug-gnulib@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Gnulib discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnulib-bounces+normalperson=yhbt.net@gnu.org Sender: "bug-gnulib" Andrew Pennebaker wrote: > Could we improve how gnulib integrates with downstream projects, to make it > easier to work with different build tools? In particular, would be helpful > for gnulib to easily work with cmake projects. It would also be helpful for Gnulib to work better with GNU Make, while we're thinking about what to add to our to-do list. (I contributed some changes in that area, but I'm sure more improvements would be helpful.) The problem here mainly is a shortage of volunteers to do the work.